Live data from Hacker News

GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

gnu.io

171–180 of 259 posts

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#171
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

His core ideas of free software are based on the concept of being free from control over it. The idea is anarchistic since by controlling the software and computing technology one controls society in some way, and the more technology is intertwined with social aspects (which gradually happens the more technology progresses), the higher is that level of control.

As someone else said, Stallman does not identify himself as being an anarchist. If you listen to his talks, he does spend some time on what we need to do to protect ourselves politically and the need to protect democracy. I may be in the minority: I agree with almost everything that Richard says.

> As someone else said, Stallman does not identify himself as being an anarchist.

Self identification is his personal choice. I'm talking about his ideas however.

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#172

Before the site has given me any reason to join, it makes me choose between 7 virtually indistinguishable options of providers with subtle technical advantages and disadvantages. Ah, GNU projects. Never change.

They also link to this:

http://www.skilledtests.com/wiki/List_of_Independent_Statusn...

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#173
post #126

How hard/easy is it to switch servers and retain @accountname references (i.e. your username)? When faced with a big list of servers to choose between, my hesitation is that I'll pick one now and realize later that another one is better. For example, I may someday want to host GNU social myself, but if I do so will I essentially be starting over (even if I can retain my data, will my connections still retain a relati…

As with any other service it depends whether your username has already been taken or not.

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#174
post #150

I just realized that decentralization is awesome for privacy and all, but for social networks sucks big time.

I have only been using GNU Social for about 18 hours, but so far the decentralization does not seem to be a problem. When you have an account on one person's (or organization's) server, you can "remote follow" people elsewhere and that seems to work just fine.

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's just not a centralized paradigm. Joining an existing server means you'll be subject to whatever moderation policy the admin has. Or you can just run your own server and then federate with the rest, as I do.

There needs to be a much better solution to the use case of having to jettison from an existing federation that might be disappearing soon (or where the admin changes the rules and you no longer want to be there). Currently, the only fix is to create a brand new account on a different federation and start again.

Again that may just be the wrong paradigm. If you are especially concerned about disappearance of a server then just run your own installation. This is partially why I'm making debian packages for GNU Social, to make that process easy.

There isn't really any "different federation". You just follow whoever you want to follow, regardless of what server they're on.

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#177

After reading about GNU Social on HN last night I created an account on the first of the 6 provides, loadaverage.org I like the service and I am considering running my own server. My account is https://loadaverage.org/markwatson and I am going to start out by cross posting some of the things I post on Twitter and G+ and see where this goes. When I quit consulting at Google in 2013 the first thing I did when I got hom…

I guess the mentioned article is http://blog.markwatson.com/2014/07/practical-internet-privac...

Have you modified your approach since then?

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#178
post #165
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You probably shouldn't choose any of them, but should set up your own server, but some people don't want to do that, and we don't want to play favorites and say "this is the best server to join" so instead we list a few servers run by our community.

"To use our version of Twitter, first set up your own server" is even worse user experience than picking between seven preexisting servers.

"To send email, first set up your own server."

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#179
post #165
post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You probably shouldn't choose any of them, but should set up your own server, but some people don't want to do that, and we don't want to play favorites and say "this is the best server to join" so instead we list a few servers run by our community.

"To use our version of Twitter, first set up your own server" is even worse user experience than picking between seven preexisting servers.

Installing the software is a different use case from using an existing instance. It's simple to do (compared to buying Twitter or writing your own industrial-strength social networking system from scratch) if you are the kind of user that kind of thing is simple for. Otherwise, you have a wide choice of existing instances to choose from.

There are many more than seven existing servers. Consumer choice is a good thing. User confusion less so.

Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter

#180
post #176

A PHP project without a composer.json? Say it ain't so! https://git.gnu.io/gnu/gnu-social/tree/master

It's so. GNU social is designed to be easily hostable on cheap server slices where ssh-ing in and running composer may not be easy.

Sure, but `composer update` is an easier way to pull in dependencies than manually untarring them.
Post reply on HN