what leaves me skeptic about these kind of alternative services like GNUSocial and Diaspora is not much when, if ever, or how they will be able to attract the necessary critical mass of users that makes them relevant. Instead, it what would happen after that. The main two questions I would be interested in would be: (1) do they scale to the size of, say, Twitter (~400M Daily Active Users, Facebook ~1B DAU)? (2) what…
GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
131–140 of 259 posts
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#132Copying the design of Twitter and Facebook. What a great way to make a good first impression and to respect the copyright the GNU project cares so much about. I can't imagine a better way to show everyone just how amazing you are. The free software community must be truly happy to have such amazing supporters on their side.
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#133Before the site has given me any reason to join, it makes me choose between 7 virtually indistinguishable options of providers with subtle technical advantages and disadvantages. Ah, GNU projects. Never change.
That's because the story links to the "try" page, the normal page is at https://gnu.io/social/
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#134Before the site has given me any reason to join, it makes me choose between 7 virtually indistinguishable options of providers with subtle technical advantages and disadvantages. Ah, GNU projects. Never change.
That's because the story links to the "try" page, the normal page is at https://gnu.io/social/
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#135Before the site has given me any reason to join, it makes me choose between 7 virtually indistinguishable options of providers with subtle technical advantages and disadvantages. Ah, GNU projects. Never change.
I can't even.
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sure, but I'd say 1 hour/week is quite a bit more than the a normal person would like to spend on maintaining apps (probably 0). Why someone would want to run their own instance of their favorite web app when most are given away for free, no maintenance required.
The average person is not supposed to maintain their own node for these services. That's why they have us who give our free time and our VPS accounts to host such things. It basically comes down to trusting Big Media or trusting your neighbour with your data. I personally doubt we'll see a big breakthrough for Big Media alternatives because people go where their friends are. I am unfortunately expecting fragmentation…
* Usenet vs Internet.
* IRC vs AOL Instant Messenger
* Email vs Xanga / Myspace / Facebook
* Torrent vs Dropbox / Cloud Storage
Federated has its advantages. Centralized has its advantages. 40 years from now, people will continue to use the federated platform. The centralized platform only stays around as long as it is profitable.
But while the centralized platform is around, things are a lot more convenient and mainstream.
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#137This software and discussion miss the reason you can't descentralized a twitter clone: analytics. One of the advantages of centralized services is the capability to quickly analyze what's going on from the content of the messages but you can't do that with a descentralized service.
For an enterprise, yes, analytics would certainly be more important; because you'd want to measure success of whatever...but those are goals more for a company. If I only wish to share with, say, my family and a few important friends (without resorting to email blasts) the types of things folks normally share on a centralized social network, then analytics isn't important for me. I just basically need to host "the pa…
I am not pro Twitter, I am just saying that from the computer science point of view you can't find a distributed solution to one of the problems Twitter is trying to solve.
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really. I've been running a Jabber server and a GNU Social node for about a year now and I can tell you it takes maybe 1 hour a week of my time for patching. I have automatic security updates enabled on both systems but I tend to login from time to time and do a dist-upgrade on them manually.
Sure, but I'd say 1 hour/week is quite a bit more than the a normal person would like to spend on maintaining apps (probably 0). Why someone would want to run their own instance of their favorite web app when most are given away for free, no maintenance required.
Although regular users can support by simply using the services and contributing.
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#139Is there a good way to publish to this at the same time as twitter, so I'm already established and can drop twitter when it dies?
In my humble opinion, that's what ruined indenti.ca back in the day. If you're mirroring Twitter and losing the interactions you have in GNU Social, your account is just a bot and you're not really using the social network .
Re: GNU Social, a FLOSS alternative to Twitter
#140Before the site has given me any reason to join, it makes me choose between 7 virtually indistinguishable options of providers with subtle technical advantages and disadvantages. Ah, GNU projects. Never change.
Haha I don't even know which one to join. Feels like I'll make the wrong choice. GNU projects always remind me why programmers alone isn't enough, apps also need good design and UX.
Some people need others to think for them. Some people like to make their own decisions. GNU is for the latter ones. GNU has always been freedom of choice.
Design is overrated. Functionality and reliability are more important. Even Apple has to admit that.