Live data from Hacker News

Introducing the Keybase filesystem

keybase.io

151–160 of 501 posts

Re: Introducing the Keybase filesystem

#152

so assuming one trusts the model, would it work to have something like: I have a /me/private/yourwebsite.com set up to be shared between me and your particular site, the link is set-up when I sign up when I log in your site, it would look for this directory to be there, in this directory there will be a file with a password hash, the server would load it, and validate the hash of the typed in password against the has…

I actually wrote something like that for Keybase before KBFS was announced: https://github.com/jzila/kb-login-ext

The approach you detailed is the way to go once the filesystem is in the wild. Such power!

Re: Introducing the Keybase filesystem

#156
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is DropBox with secure digital signatures and end-to-end encryption integrated into it in a easily accessible way.

what confused me was how they say they are not a sync service. I am still confused.

They're calling it a "file system," whatever that means. Presumably it means you can create encrypted virtual disk partitions that represent network storage shared with various peers, and treat those partitions as if they were resident on local drives.

Agreed that they need to work on the narrative a bit.

Re: Introducing the Keybase filesystem

#157

I would love an invite in anyone has one. Email in my profile. Thanks!

I sent you the invite. It should be in your inbox. :)

Would you still happen to have any invites left?

I'd love to give Keybase a spin as well! =)

(Email is in my profile)

Re: Introducing the Keybase filesystem

#159
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is DropBox with secure digital signatures and end-to-end encryption integrated into it in a easily accessible way.

what confused me was how they say they are not a sync service. I am still confused.

Dropbox synchronizes files between your computer and their servers. Keybase stores the files on their servers and only downloads/uploads them "on demand". Think of your web browser accessing gmail.com versus running something like Thunderbird that downloads your mail locally.

As a benefit, it's much simpler to implement - you don't need to work as hard to handle conflicts where two people made incompatible changes while offline. However, it will be slower for bulk operations and will require an internet connection.

Post reply on HN