Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
11–20 of 290 posts
Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#12Money a city gives towards a stadium should be returned in the form of shares in the team. Otherwise no deal. St. Louis should be selling their shares to LA for a profit right now...
Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#13Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#14That said, I most certainly agree that cities should not be in the business of subsidizing sports teams, when those are private money making enterprises.
St. Louis should sue the NFL and all cities in the same position (potentially liable for stadium costs, if team were to leave) should hold out till the NFL guarantees debts.
Build schools, get more teachers, do something worthwhile with the tax dollars you have.
Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#15Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#161. Without going too far out on a tangent, there was more to the story, see here: http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_20107165
2. "Stabler is the seventh former N.F.L. quarterback to be found to have had C.T.E. by Boston University, which has found C.T.E. in 90 of the 94 former N.F.L. players it has examined" http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/04/sports/football/ken-stable...
Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sports are a form of entertainment....entertainment can and does drive spending.... and spending can contribute to more jobs and more tax revenue. Seems fair that sports are, in turn, a public concern. That isn't to say that building a stadium or hosting the Olympics is inherently a profitable affair.
I'd be ok with this argument only if the leagues were nationalized.
Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#18Between the scam of municipalities losing so much $$ on stadiums, how the stadiums cause urban blight sitting empty most of the time then causing major traffic headaches the other times, and the CTE injury rate, I can't fathom how football still exists today as a popular sport. Seems like the whole thing is a house of cards that needs to collapse.
[1] http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240527487042812045750028...
Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#19Between the scam of municipalities losing so much $$ on stadiums, how the stadiums cause urban blight sitting empty most of the time then causing major traffic headaches the other times, and the CTE injury rate, I can't fathom how football still exists today as a popular sport. Seems like the whole thing is a house of cards that needs to collapse.
Your first three points make sense, but don't lead to this conclusion at all. People are not going to rationally say "football leads to traffic so I'm not going to watch it anymore." Football is entertaining, which is why it has an audience. Whether or not the negatives you outlined above are funded by the gov't is an entirely different matter.
Re: Why a city should not build a stadium for an NFL team
#20Between the scam of municipalities losing so much $$ on stadiums, how the stadiums cause urban blight sitting empty most of the time then causing major traffic headaches the other times, and the CTE injury rate, I can't fathom how football still exists today as a popular sport. Seems like the whole thing is a house of cards that needs to collapse.
I don't understand why it exists as a popular sport anyways, it's 5 seconds of action followed by 30 seconds of two guys talking about it. The average football game has 11 minutes of action[1]. Everything but the last ~8 minutes of the 4th quarter is boring. Yet Americans love it. I don't get it. [1] http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB100014240527487042812045750028...
I dislike the game because the players get horribly injured, either immediately, or decades later. The NFL is a company that makes money by encouraging degenerative brain disease in its employees.