Earlier quoted context omitted.
So she went linearly through the whole alphabet until he found the letter he wanted? Sounds like somebody should have used a binary search! Hey-oooo!
I wonder which would actually faster - binary search on the standard ordered alphabet or going linearly in order of letter frequency. Even better - some hybrid algorithm that goes through the most common letters then goes into binary search for the remaining letters (many of which appear at approximately equal frequency)
'Vegetative' patient speaks to scientists using his brainwaves
31–36 of 36 posts
Re: 'Vegetative' patient speaks to scientists using his brainwaves
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
So she went linearly through the whole alphabet until he found the letter he wanted? Sounds like somebody should have used a binary search! Hey-oooo!
I wonder which would actually faster - binary search on the standard ordered alphabet or going linearly in order of letter frequency. Even better - some hybrid algorithm that goes through the most common letters then goes into binary search for the remaining letters (many of which appear at approximately equal frequency)
Re: 'Vegetative' patient speaks to scientists using his brainwaves
#33http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/313/5792/1402
However, I think their publishing the idea that these patients were "conscious" is morally questionable. The reasons for this are expressed far more elegantly that I could manage by Parashkev Nachev in the following response:
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/reprint/sci;315/5816/1221a.pdf
Re: 'Vegetative' patient speaks to scientists using his brainwaves
#34This whole story is really very fascinating, although a few details seem a bit odd. For example, the patient didn't answer the last question because.. he fell asleep? I would imagine if I was trapped inside my body and suddenly given a mechanism to communicate, I would be too excited to fall asleep. Did they observe any signs of excitement that I would expect a person to feel in this situation? Increased heart rate o…
Actually, detecting brain activity in an MRI requires long aquisition times. Around 30 seconds per answer at least (which is the duration used in this study AFAIK). That means that a single "yes" (imagining you're playing tennis) or "no" (imagining you're walking in your house) requires 30 seconds of sustained attention. This patient is obviously severely brain damaged. If you've ever seen a person recovering from br…
Imagine being locked-in for so many years, and then suddenly being asked to imagine things. It's not as easy as it sounds: Imagining something in such a strict order over such a long period of time is actually quite exhausting.
Re: 'Vegetative' patient speaks to scientists using his brainwaves
#35If that patient is actually aware of his surroundings, then he has been trapped in a body with almost no sensory input for almost 6 years. Personally, that sounds like the worst hell imaginable. I've told everyone close to me that if I am injured badly they are to ask for 'no extreme measures' for this exact reason...
Re: 'Vegetative' patient speaks to scientists using his brainwaves
#36Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think within a few months you would descend into a self-hallucinatory dreamworld -- you'd be insane, but I don't think it would be the worst hell imaginable. Not even close.
Hallucinations are caused by sensory-deprivation rather than motor parylization. For example, float tanks, also there are specially designed rooms that have as close to no background noise as possible, and people report hearing all kind of audio hallucinations such as bees, etc. This test demonstrates he can at least hear sound. I'd imagine the effects would resemble senility from lack of engagement more. Also, inter…