Live data from Hacker News

GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

github.com

21–30 of 119 posts

Re: GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

#21
Is there a list of new features in Jekyll 3 vs. 2? I looked at Jekyll's docs and can't seem to find anything. It has a nice guide of how to move from 2 to 3, but is there any succinct list of what new stuff you can do in 3, if anything?

edit: Actually, this looks promising: https://jekyllrb.com/news/2015/10/26/jekyll-3-0-released/

Re: GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

#22
post #8

Absolutely love Jekyll and GitHub Pages for hosting project documentation and personal websites. Just wish GH Pages would support SSL. :(

I'm working on a static hosting service. We are working on SSL and making that easy. Would you be interested in trying the beta? http://www.statichosting.co

Re: GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

#23
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can always add CloudFlare in front of it. They also provide free SSL certificates.

That's.. not the same.

In case SSL support is essential to you please know that we'll looking to bring it to _GitLab_ Pages in a few months https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/134

Re: GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

#24
post #16

Slightly off topic but is RoR still the web framework of choice for developers? Could be just me but it seems most unicorns still continue to use it, even with all of the Python/Node/PHP frameworks out there.

If I were to guess I'd say no, with the majority being Node.js, then a mixture of Rails, Python, Go, and Erlang for the rest. As a note, Jekyll isn't using Rails, it's just using Ruby.

Re: GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

#27
OK, a standard dialect of Markdown.

In the beginning was RUNOFF from MIT, which originally had about the power of Markdown. More features were added, and it became nroff, then troff, the ditrofff, and macro systems were added on top of it. It became too hard to use for casual work.

Then there was TeX, which was a saner approach to what troff did. Macro systems were added on top of it. It became too hard to use for casual work.

Then there was HTML, which started out with about the power of Markdown. More features were added. It became too hard to use for casual work.

Then there was BBcode, which started out with about the power of original HTML. It didn't gain many features, and is still widely used.

Then there was Markdown, which started out with about the power of original HTML. More features were added. Macros have been added by at least five people, but haven't quite gone mainstream yet. When Markdown gets macros, it, too, will be too hard to use for casual work.

Next!

Re: GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

#28

Hmm, I hate to be a downer but this is a bit of a disappointing announcement for a major upgrade - basically, one very minor addition and a bunch of features removed - not that they were needed/widely used, but there's nothing else to show for it. Am I missing something? Also it's a bit unfortunate there's still no easy way to do site translation in Jekyll. Anyway, well done on the upgrade. Love jekyll.

A lot of the Jekyll 3 changes [1] thus far are focused on making the development life easier: faster (incremental) local builds and a lighter, easier to install stack with fewer dependencies (no more native library dependencies out of the box, no more dependencies on Python and Node by default).

Correct, nothing really mind blowing if you have all of it already set up and a relatively small Jekyll site, but big news for new users (especially on Windows where the native libraries and multi-language support have been bigger hurdles) and for people with large sites both in locally developing and debugging them and also in Github deployment times.

[1] https://jekyllrb.com/news/2015/10/26/jekyll-3-0-released/

Re: GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

#29

Hmm, I hate to be a downer but this is a bit of a disappointing announcement for a major upgrade - basically, one very minor addition and a bunch of features removed - not that they were needed/widely used, but there's nothing else to show for it. Am I missing something? Also it's a bit unfortunate there's still no easy way to do site translation in Jekyll. Anyway, well done on the upgrade. Love jekyll.

I have to agree: they took away 2 features I was using and gave me better performance in the one place I don't care about performance.

Re: GitHub pages is now running Jekyll 3

#30

Jekyll 3 is pretty great. If you need any help getting your site hosted, I'm working on a hosting setup that is way easier than S3 or any other option out there. http://www.statichosting.co We are in private beta and are looking for people to try it out and give us feedback. We think it's great and are looking for early adopters who want an awesome static hosting experience.

Pretty cool! If you can set up some sort of integration with Travis (which itself integrates nicely with GitHub), and you set up SSL, HTTP/2, good caching policies etc., you're golden.
Post reply on HN