Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What should we fund at YC Research?

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 545 posts

Re: Ask HN: What should we fund at YC Research?

#72

Robotic or automated environment clean up. Open source. Fish plastic out of the sea. Oil out of water. Things like that. Solar powered (or wind etc) little machines that communities can buy (e.g. the local surfing club) and we can let lose into the problem area.

Along with clean nuclear fusion (already well funded), this is another great idea. I think there are already a couple of big projects working on this...

http://www.theoceancleanup.com/

Re: Ask HN: What should we fund at YC Research?

#73
OpenHarvest - Research into food growth and optimization

There's a lot of research being done currently, but it's all private research so every new company has to rediscover what somebody has already done. For startups that have great potential in this space, this is a major issue as the it takes a very long time to perform testing of plants(each crop cycle is ~4 weeks) and that burn through their runway easily. Another issue here is that some of the openly available information out there is just for conventional soil farming. There's nothing really out there for hydroponics/aquaponics. So when you're direct seeding new crops in hydroponics/aquaponics, you have to completely guess on the density of the seeds and the amount/frequency of the watering. There's no way to convert recommended seeding directions for soil to hydroponics. There's no more rows, access to water isn't the same since water is easily available, density affects lighting and lighting affect density. This is a huge problem keeping the hydroponic and aquaponic community moving forward with innovation because it's hard to compete with yields when the yields haven't been optimized for your new growing medium yet. It's also hard to test your new growing apparatus or technology when you're struggling to find the most optimal way to grow the plants. Not sure if this is making much sense, kind of rambling right now. If you'd like more information you can find my email in my profile. I've been working in hydroponics/aquaponics my whole career and this is a problem I've seen at every facility.

Re: Ask HN: What should we fund at YC Research?

#75
I'm not affiliated with this project but ucoin would be a great idea to fund. Basically combine basic income + Bitcoin - mining costs.

It requires a trust graph currently but a centralised authority would be ok in my view (we interact with them everyday - government organisations).

http://en.ucoin.io

Re: Ask HN: What should we fund at YC Research?

#76
I feel like the world runs on several billion dollars with of insecure code, like GNU/Linux, Apache, OpenSSL, OpenSSH, etc. This code will last decades, and YC startups in particular rely a lot on it.

It's not clear that the current processes for writing code and then patching security holes will bring us into the future. Powerful governments and companies are routinely hacked.

Can we move all this code to a secure future without rewriting it all?

On the other hand, there are existing efforts, like https://www.coreinfrastructure.org/

I'm not sure how well they are funded.

Re: Ask HN: What should we fund at YC Research?

#77
post #60

Cheap Virtual Reality behavioral therapy. There is research that show great promise in VR phobia therapy. VR seems to be quite a potent medium for modifying habitual patterns and emotional reactions. And soon it will be a popular hardware. It would be quite interesting to research the possibility of delivering working (open source? / mental health as an app?) behavioral therapy solutions for home VR ecosystems. There…

I'm working on this as a startup called Fearless.

http://FearlessVR.com

Re: Ask HN: What should we fund at YC Research?

#78

Linux reverse engineering efforts (i.e. Open source drivers to replace closed source drivers). We use Linux all the time, how about supporting its future?

Linux is really important, but it's the best-funded FOSS project already. No other project gets a comparable amount of time by comparably skilled developers.

An open source driver for any particular piece of hardware is only useful for that exact piece of hardware, and maybe a few generations after it. But it's usefulness dies with the usage of the hardware. Contrast with basic research, which stays around forever and can be meaningfully built on for much longer.

Research is more about underlying concepts than about actually building concrete implementations (be they software or whatnot) (though that may be part of the research process - but only as the means to an end).

Re: Ask HN: What should we fund at YC Research?

#80
Drug safety initiatives for illegal substance users. Mix of scientific research, knowledge distribution and legal lobbying.

As much research into mental health as possible.

How to use technology to better inform the population of political matters and allow them to more directly influence the actions of politicians.

Post reply on HN