Live data from Hacker News

Update on 1/28 service outage

github.com

1–10 of 193 posts

Re: Update on 1/28 service outage

#5
post #2

Not much detail here. A more thorough postmortem would give me more confidence they can recover from another similar issue. Hoping to see one soon.

I agree that a postmortem would be great, but it's good PR for companies to quickly put out statements like this to admit fault and maintain customer trust.

Re: Update on 1/28 service outage

#7
post #4

[deleted]

I'm starting to think that people should mirror their packages to BitBucket as a rule, and that package managers should round robin/flip a coin between the two, or use whichever is available in case of outages.

Re: Update on 1/28 service outage

#9
post #2

Not much detail here. A more thorough postmortem would give me more confidence they can recover from another similar issue. Hoping to see one soon.

Yep, I think most of these post-mortems from any company are pointless from a technical perspective. It's 4 paragraphs that boils down to "someone did something wrong and we'll make sure it doesn't happen" with zero specifics.

There's no point in reading these because there's no technical information. Stuff like this is something you sent to your customer because they want root cause.

Re: Update on 1/28 service outage

#10
"Millions of people and businesses depend on GitHub"

Well, we shouldn't depend on it so much.

I shudder at the thought what an outage of GitHub would mean for our company. This time, we were lucky as it was during the night in Europe.

Unfortunately, I don't have the power to test this scenario in our company.

Post reply on HN