Live data from Hacker News

MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

tech.mit.edu

221–230 of 281 posts

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#221
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you really know about George W. Bush? http://keithhennessey.com/2013/04/24/smarter/

If Bush is that smart, what does that tell us about his questionable decisions on other things? Why start a war in Iraq based on WMD's that weren't there, and a government that was not in league with Osama bin Laden? Why start dragnet surveillance? Why let the CIA torture people? Why do the ridiculous tax cuts at the same time we're spending big dollar on a war? If Bush is that smart, he must have good motives for th…

There's a lot of people whose intellectual credentials are unassailable that supported all of those programs. The differences in opinion come down to values and ideology, not intelligence.

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#222
post #89

The current system was created for a reason: because for most people, it works. I ran a language learning group for a couple of years and we tried many different styles of learning. With no structure, most people flounder. Unless you already learned the material and just need it for review, it really doesn't work well. The best was complete structure: tests, lesson plans, and homework. Most people are passive. They w…

> Most people are passive. They want a teacher to lead them and guide them through the learning process. Bull. Most people have any interest in learning beaten out of them by our crappy factory/prison like educational system. Because you know what's not conducive to learning? Having no choice as far as subjects; having no choice how long you spend on them; having no choice on who to learn from; having no choice who y…

I think people need the structure. We need the guidance. We don't know what we don't know.

I grumbled when I had to take a class that had nothing do with my major. But it changed the way I think about things. It was a great class.

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#223
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you really know about George W. Bush? http://keithhennessey.com/2013/04/24/smarter/

Bush? When asked a question, he'd never give an answer that illustrated a deep depth of analysis. Now he certainly could have done the analysis all the time, but he never spoke about it so I did not have any insight into was his thinking process was. Now, I never thought he was dumb but his persona of well-mannered everyman never slipped even one bit, so if it's a mask, I have no idea what is beneath it. He could be…

> When asked a question, he'd never give an answer that illustrated a deep depth of analysis.

You wouldn't either if you were talking to the general public.

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#224
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you have not joined the university you are not part of the "in" group. There is a perception among people that if you attend a "prestigious" university that you are smarter than someone who attends a community college. I find that crazy. Both teach basically the same thing. If they are both accredited, then it is almost indistinguishable. Who would you think is smarter off the cuff, a Harvard graduate, or someone…

Intro courses are the same (calculus and basic chemistry are calculus and basic chemistry) but once you get past anything more difficult than 101 you see a wild disparity in difficulty across different universities (some universities will have material as junior-level undergrad that others have as graduate). Community colleges don't even try to teach the vast majority of courses taught at the smallest least prestigio…

>Intro courses are the same (calculus and basic chemistry are calculus and basic chemistry)

I went to a tech school. I also went to community college over my first summer for some basic classes. The community college classes were laughably easy and most certainly weren't anywhere near college level, and this was considered a "good" community college.

I hear that in state schools they pack 100+ people in a lecture hall for biology 101 or whatever. That seems like it would be difficult to learn that way. I went to a private school and there was no giant classes.

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#225

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> theory of computation, recursion theory and type theory and PL, compilers, complexity theory and algorithms, advanced data structures, concurrency and distributed systems etc All of those are fairly basic topics that most people can pick up in an afternoon or two. ... I think these are fairly rational claims that I am making Um... no. Not fairly rational claims at all.

When I get into my classes at my university I get the textbook, read into the book a little and say "ok, I remember learning about this from X, Y, and Z project I've worked on". I then go on to goof off in every class, as I am doing right this moment. Nothing I have learned is of substance in my algorithms, computer science, or programming classes that I did not already know before I enrolled. I'm bored, and I want t…

Sounds like you need to transfer to a better university.

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#226
post #212

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, part of it should be that the student gets academic credits that count towards graduation. Even establishing minimum and maximum quotas of which credits come from apprenticeships is healthy with moderation. But a bigger part of it is that the University must provide for oversight so that the actual tasks assigned to the students is relevant to their academic goals, and that the complexity of the tasks increases…

I would argue even if they do rent "slave labor", if the tasks are appropriate to the chosen specialization, and the cost to the student is lower overall (ideally zero for tuition), it'd be an improvement over the status quo.

What I am hearing is that, as long as you do "something with computers" and it does not cost any extra money, you'd be happy to exchange 4 years of your time for a Bs in CS?

What about getting - gasps, the horror - and actual job as a data entry clerk? You know... something that pays you money instead of making the dean richer with your efforts?

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#227
post #86

I like the idea of project based learning. I think it will end up being a more lasting method of instruction. I am interested in how they will still teach the breadth of the subject matter. For example, you can get a lot of work done with linear algebra without really understanding vector spaces. I assume this method of instruction would require more teacher-student interaction to be effective. The teacher could revi…

Yes you are right. This sort of teaching is very effective, but very expensive. The reason we have the current system we do is because it is the cheapest solution that somewhat works.

Except our current solution has become very expensive. Perhaps we need to move out of our local maxima of education if people are willing to pay so much.

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#228
post #71

The current system was created for a reason: because for most people, it works. I ran a language learning group for a couple of years and we tried many different styles of learning. With no structure, most people flounder. Unless you already learned the material and just need it for review, it really doesn't work well. The best was complete structure: tests, lesson plans, and homework. Most people are passive. They w…

>most people are passive They are not naturally. But society designed by people like you turned them to being passive. Imagine people start education from start in society like this university, everyone will be excited, because they are going to do what they like . My problem with people like you is this.you are scaling your small experience to one of the fundamental things in human kind. Maybe passiveness in your la…

What happens when you find out that what most people think they "like" is to hang up with friends, drink beer, play games and have as much sex as you possibly can?

What happens when said group of people finds out there's such horrible things as bankrupcy, or debt collection, or evictions?

What happens when they figure out that the things everybody expects them to do to pull themselves out of the mess is complex stuff that cannot be learned on the fly, and that requires years of practice before results can be obtained by investing a reasonable amount of effort?

It is good and proper to enjoy ourselves in life, but sometimes you need to force yourself to do stuff that either you must do right now in order to avoid extremely unpleasant outcomes, or that you should do in order to position yourself for more good things to come your way in the future.

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#229
post #89

The current system was created for a reason: because for most people, it works. I ran a language learning group for a couple of years and we tried many different styles of learning. With no structure, most people flounder. Unless you already learned the material and just need it for review, it really doesn't work well. The best was complete structure: tests, lesson plans, and homework. Most people are passive. They w…

> Most people are passive. They want a teacher to lead them and guide them through the learning process. Bull. Most people have any interest in learning beaten out of them by our crappy factory/prison like educational system. Because you know what's not conducive to learning? Having no choice as far as subjects; having no choice how long you spend on them; having no choice on who to learn from; having no choice who y…

"Bull. Most people have any interest in learning beaten out of them by our crappy factory/prison like educational system. Because you know what's not conducive to learning? Having no choice as far as subjects; having no choice how long you spend on them; having no choice on who to learn from; having no choice who you learn with."

Most people don't really want to choose and if given too many choices, will be overwhelmed and not get anything accomplished.

New learners of language, for example, have no idea where to start, which teacher to choose, or which subject they need to learn.

I work for myself and I've been working on my current project for over a year. There were so many times I wanted to give up and so many boring parts, but I slogged through it all, because I know the end result will be a great accomplishment.

I've met so many developers that get bored when they have to work on something that has the slightest hint of monotony. I feel like that's one of my greatest assets and I

We should encourage discipline when learning..and the method you suggested with 50 minute segments, etc does the exact opposite.

Experienced teachers know exactly what someone needs to learn to get to the point where they can learn for themselves.

This is what k-12 is all about. Once you get into college, you most definitely have the choice.

There may be students that get to this point faster..which I think is what AP classes are all about.

"How much work would most developers get done if they had their day broken into 50 minute segments, five minute transition times, and six different projects they were required to work on every day with equal consistency?"

I have no idea about other developers, but for me, not much. This sounds like a terrible way to develop any project.

"PG has a classic essay on makers vs managers on scheduling, and he places emphasis on how for work like programming, getting into the material takes time. I see no reason this wouldn't apply to learning."

The mistake here is assuming everyone has the mind of an engineer/software developer.

"My mother runs a Montessori preschool. Consistently, the kids that go off to first grade come back with stories of attending traditional school and wondering when they get to start doing something instead of sitting at their desk. Or when they can do something new instead of going through material they already know with the class"

Children shouldn't be making these decisions. When I was in school, I hated math. If given the choice, I would have played video games all day. Looking back, I'm glad I was forced to sit and learn all of those math skills that I pretty much use every day. Part of learning is memorization, which can't be skipped. Another part is having the discipline to do something you don't really enjoy, but need to do it to achieve a goal.

"It bothers me greatly when someone blames the nature of people for problems that are systemic in nature"

Systems are created around human behavior, not vice-versa. My wife learned in an environment like you envision: lots of choice and very little structured learning. Since no teacher told her what to study, she now has huge gaps in knowledge that she really has no time to make up as an adult. I would never want to put a child through that as it depriving them of their future success.

"it feels no different from the ridiculous number of ADHD diagnoses we have these days, which seems to largely stem from not giving kids space to be kids."

ADHD is over-diagnosed, but removing the structure from our current education system has nothing to do with it.

I also think that we need to teach kids to put down the ipad and phones when they are learning. Having a thousand distractions doesn't help.

Re: MIT dean to start new university: “No majors, no lectures, no classrooms”

#230
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's no doubt the substance is actually more important, but the question is what folks end up caring about. As an interesting anecdote, I found that when I'm around my Chinese friends or family, I'd hear the question "where did you go to school?", but when I had conversations with White or Black folks we'd talk about "what did you study?". I think that's a pretty interesting cultural nuance. For me, the second que…

My ex girlfriend was Chinese. She thought I was making a mistake by deciding to go somewhere other than Stanford for graduate school, that I was settling for something beneath me. When I explained to her that as a professor, she or I would probably teach at places other than the school she or I studied at, she conceded that maybe she too would be willing to study at a place like Harvard. It seems in China, theres onl…

In part it's that in China your network matters a lot in life. There's somewhat of a subdivision into friends, family and strangers, and university is viewed as THE place to broaden the first group, preferably with influential people. Tsinghua, Beida, Renda are the places where future party functionaries, intellectuals and businessmen go, which is why there's such an obsession with getting into these few universities. If the only thing students cared about was an education, any of the 101 重点大学s would do just fine.

Then there's this cultural obsession with investing into your offspring that stems back to the Imperial Exams. Hell, the words that are used for the student rankings still harken back to those practices.

Further pressure is put on the children of academics, where admission to one of the top 10 Chinese universities or an Ivy League university is used as a measurement of parenting prowess.

I've experienced the insanity from a bystander perspective, and it's not without cause. I would also like to differ on the point that Chinese people go to great lengths to prove that they're not one of the peasants. They may go to great lengths to show that they're wealthy, or for the old cultural families, to great lengths to show heritage, but there's plenty of things very well to do Chinese will do that wouldn't really go for class abroad.

Post reply on HN