Live data from Hacker News

WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

blog.whatsapp.com

31–40 of 88 posts

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#31
post #25

I don't think I ever paid fees for Whatsapp, and I'm not sure how or why. But this also seems too late. Facebook own them, my family started using Facebook, and with Messenger as a separate app I more or less lost any incentive to use it.

I think only new sign ups after the fee introduction paid the fee.

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd be much more nervous about Telegram getting that data.

It's a toss up: - WhatsApp uses reputable cryptography from reputable sources, but combines it with a UI so much designed for ease of use that it throws out the possibility of real security - Telegram uses extremely questionable cryptography to begin with from people who probably shouldn't be designing cryptosystems If you want real security, go use Signal or better, OTR where socialist millionaire's is still an opti…

Doesn't 'real security' quickly escalate to not having a cell phone at all?

The best opsec advice for normal people seems to be not to op.

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#33

> Starting this year, we will test tools that allow you to use WhatsApp to communicate with businesses and organizations that you want to hear from. That could mean communicating with your bank about whether a recent transaction was fraudulent, or with an airline about a delayed flight. Sounds a lot like what WeChat has been doing in China with their Official Accounts. Best explanation I could find quickly: http://kn…

This. A messaging app like WhatsApp could become a platform. I'm not sure how the "apps" in this world would look like but I would find it great if text interactions (like on IRC, in the shell, or a text adventure) would have a comeback. Forget most of HTML/CSS and get back to basics ;-) In reality, some graphical UI will probably be necessary.

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a toss up: - WhatsApp uses reputable cryptography from reputable sources, but combines it with a UI so much designed for ease of use that it throws out the possibility of real security - Telegram uses extremely questionable cryptography to begin with from people who probably shouldn't be designing cryptosystems If you want real security, go use Signal or better, OTR where socialist millionaire's is still an opti…

I've read up a while ago on the questionable cryptography (not an expert in that at all myself) but couldn't find a lot of actual substance. Certainly with claims [0] [1] being that Telegram offers nice sums for breaking it, which gives me as a consumer the idea that someone who actually knows this stuff would love to hit that down, if it was something in my area of expertise offering that I'd love to try and hit it.…

What have you read about the questionable cryptography in Telegram that you found unpersuasive? That's a better starting point, because the formulation you use here is often used on message boards to bait people into doing research work that is then dismissed.

Your comment includes an assertion that there aren't substantial complaints about Telegram's security (there very much are, BTW). I think the onus is on you to defend that argument.

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's a toss up: - WhatsApp uses reputable cryptography from reputable sources, but combines it with a UI so much designed for ease of use that it throws out the possibility of real security - Telegram uses extremely questionable cryptography to begin with from people who probably shouldn't be designing cryptosystems If you want real security, go use Signal or better, OTR where socialist millionaire's is still an opti…

I've read up a while ago on the questionable cryptography (not an expert in that at all myself) but couldn't find a lot of actual substance. Certainly with claims [0] [1] being that Telegram offers nice sums for breaking it, which gives me as a consumer the idea that someone who actually knows this stuff would love to hit that down, if it was something in my area of expertise offering that I'd love to try and hit it.…

[deleted]

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#36
post #11

That's too bad. If you're paying, you're the customer. If you're not paying, you're the product.

So long as revenue sources other than subscription fees are more lucrative than the subscription fees, it remains the case that users are "the product", even if fees are charged.

For fees to change the balance, they have to have enough economic weight to swamp advertising and tracking revenue, so that losing users makes tracking unprofitable. But very few services like WhatsApp can charge so much that the balance is shifted.

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#37

Paid business services for customer interaction, sound like a plausible business model for WhatsApp. However, I get the feeling this is only part of the story. I assume that data mined by WhatsApp are probably more valuable to Facebook.

I would agree. I think their user base has hit some tipping point which ensures other revenue streams. That's the only reason I can think they would throw the fees... out the window.

(nice user name)

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#38
post #11

That's too bad. If you're paying, you're the customer. If you're not paying, you're the product.

People seem to say this all the time, but assuming it's true, what's inherently wrong with "being the product"?

> what's inherently wrong with "being the product"?

Products are sold

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#39
post #33

> Starting this year, we will test tools that allow you to use WhatsApp to communicate with businesses and organizations that you want to hear from. That could mean communicating with your bank about whether a recent transaction was fraudulent, or with an airline about a delayed flight. Sounds a lot like what WeChat has been doing in China with their Official Accounts. Best explanation I could find quickly: http://kn…

This. A messaging app like WhatsApp could become a platform. I'm not sure how the "apps" in this world would look like but I would find it great if text interactions (like on IRC, in the shell, or a text adventure) would have a comeback. Forget most of HTML/CSS and get back to basics ;-) In reality, some graphical UI will probably be necessary.

I just wish we had a good way to do this without locking it all into a single proprietary platform.

Re: WhatsApp will no longer charge subscription fees

#40

Signal is also free and based on a business model that doesn't require eventually being able to interfere with your privacy and mine your data. https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/signal-private-messenger/id8... https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.thoughtcri...

What business model is Signal based on?
Post reply on HN