Live data from Hacker News

Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

about.gitlab.com

51–60 of 325 posts

Re: Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

#51
post #45

Because the thread has turned into a "why I like/dislike GitLab over GitHub", I'll say one thing that keeps sending me back to GitHub is the neat-o desktop client. I use a command line for everything else in life; but with Git I'm hopeless.

Have you tried Hub (http://hub.github.com)? It makes life with command line Git easier (so long as you work with GitHub primarily).

Re: Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

#52
Please improve your mobile UI - phones have lesser horizontal space than vertical. You have put a cool looking sidebar on the left side which takes up a lot of space causing text layout to be funny on my 5.2 inch LG G2.

Github OTOH has an extremely usable mobile UI.

Re: Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Especially, it seems to be impossible to add custom searchable fields (like "platforms", "priority" or "modules") which are very very useful to do queries. Also, there is no way to do custom queries and store them ("I want all the bugs for Windows, which are related to the interface modules"). Isn't this use-case covered by Gitlab's issue labels?

If you have to create a label for every platform you support and every existing priority and module, the labels list will become really cluttered, making it hard to find things.

It becomes very long, but it doesn't seem overly cluttered, and it avoids the risk of overly restrictive either/or classification. Rust makes extensive uses of labels on github, they're up to 120 at this point[0] and it seems to work reasonably well even with old issues with a fair number of labels[1]

[0] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels

[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/5016

Re: Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

#54
post #3

Their issue tracker seems really busy atm: https://i.imgur.com/Iv46xnx.png

Here are snapshots of the spam sites for anyone curious:

udaiso03: https://archive.is/jZFbR NSFW!

bamwar10: https://archive.is/HeWvt

opmania35: https://archive.is/jNEr2 NSFW!

Re: Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

#57
If GitLab plays their cards right, they can take the market from github. That, in my book, will be good because unlike github, we can all contribute to making GitLab better.

The only question left is if your servers are powerful enough to run gitlab. Maybe I'll sacrifice a goat for some new server hardware and 256GB of ram.

Re: Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

#58
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually, that will not happen.

What? Listening to the developers?

A migration to Gitlab. GitHub would have to start fucking the developers asses in a serious and violent way for them to move to another place, the same way that the SourceForge -> GitHub move was done.

Re: Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

#59
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just yesterday I ended up implementing my own mirroring of GitHub repositories. GitLab supports this in EE (new in 8.3), but not CE. That's not a feature that only large enterprises use–I run an open source GitHub organization and wanted to use GitLab as CI. It works! But I needed to reimplement an EE feature to do it. To be clear, I don't think there is anything sinister about keeping features behind a paid firewall…

> I run an open source GitHub organization and wanted to use GitLab as CI. It works! But I needed to reimplement an EE feature to do it. Is there a reason why you didn't use GitLab.com, which runs EE and thus has Repository Mirroring? > I'm just saying that the EE features are not all "mostly interesting to companies with 100+ employees." Several of them are things I needed as a single open-source developer. Fair eno…

> Is there a reason why you didn't use GitLab.com, which runs EE and thus has Repository Mirroring?

1. My hosting is way more reliable than yours :-)

2. I need to host the CI runners myself anyway, because you don't have the right config

3. I already have a private GitLab install, so it's no extra trouble

4. My repository mirroring is quite a lot better than yours, as it's instant, not hourly

5. I prefer to have a commercial relationship with important tools. You seem like nice people, let's see what happens when you get acquired. As long as you can't be bothered to sell to 2-person teams, I'll just run CE and have my commercial relationship with AWS instead.

Re: Dear open-source maintainers, a letter from GitLab

#60
post #45

Because the thread has turned into a "why I like/dislike GitLab over GitHub", I'll say one thing that keeps sending me back to GitHub is the neat-o desktop client. I use a command line for everything else in life; but with Git I'm hopeless.

The GutHub GUI (GutHub Desktop) is pretty bad. Try GitKraken or Sourcetree. You can even use GitHub Desktop with Gitlab if you really want.
Post reply on HN