Live data from Hacker News

The complications of nutrition science

vox.com

1–10 of 86 posts

Re: The complications of nutrition science

#8
This was fully covered in "In Defense of Food" - good intro read for nutrition. Read that, not Vox, which is rife with strange opinions, like "overeating" being the cause of modern disease? You damn nutritional science then come up with your own solution to everyone's problem, not based in evidence? Neat.

It's oversimplifying to say the only studies nutritional science can use are observational ones. There are plenty of high quality, controlled studies on specific aspects of nutrition. We learn from those. That's also not to say that observational studies are all bad. They can be useful for determining when things don't work and aligning controlled evidence. The fact that nutrition is a hard problem doesn't mean it's not a real science.

TL;DR Learn who you can trust on nutrition (Vox is not a good start)

Re: The complications of nutrition science

#9
There is a really low bar for human nutrition in the short term. Depending on body fat, a person can go many weeks without eating anything, so a juice "cleanse" will seem to work, low-carb will seem to work, high-carb low-fat will seem to work too, vegan, paleo, etc. Nutritional deficiencies might not develop for years!
Post reply on HN