Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

How Facebook makes us dumber

bloombergview.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 124 posts

Re: How Facebook makes us dumber

#21

Post by danieltillett »

zappo2938 wrote: post #9

Reddit too. I just wrote 500 words without using any logical fallacies backing up my assertions with scientific studies from trusted sources, why does my comment have -12 points without a single person taking the time to refute my position in a comment? I believe managed, licenced hunting in Africa supports conservation efforts, there is no reason ever to spank or hit a child, all children should be vaccinated, and p…

Just out of curiosity why do you think children should never be spanked? Do you have children?

Re: How Facebook makes us dumber

#22

Post by tim333 »

jstanley wrote: post #19
tim333 wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I tried their test of googling for "guns" as usual, in incognito mode and using another browser. Identical results. Dunno if I'm doing it wrong?

If you're not into guns, it probably won't make any difference.

Ah that might be it. I tried 'singularity' and there was a slight difference.

Re: How Facebook makes us dumber

#23

Post by ajuc »

tomp wrote: post #7

Hm... the alternative explanation is, people were always dumb, Facebook (and internet in general) just makes it more apparent by giving us more oportunities to display our stupidity.

> Before I used internet for the first time I had no idea how many stupid people there are

[Stanisław Lem]

Re: How Facebook makes us dumber

#25

Post by pjc50 »

zappo2938 wrote: post #9

Reddit too. I just wrote 500 words without using any logical fallacies backing up my assertions with scientific studies from trusted sources, why does my comment have -12 points without a single person taking the time to refute my position in a comment? I believe managed, licenced hunting in Africa supports conservation efforts, there is no reason ever to spank or hit a child, all children should be vaccinated, and p…

I just wrote 500 words without using any logical fallacies backing up my assertions with scientific studies from trusted sources

This is why you're getting downvoted. That's not how you convince people.

Re: How Facebook makes us dumber

#27

Post by zappo2938 »

danieltillett wrote: post #21
zappo2938 wrote: post #9

Reddit too. I just wrote 500 words without using any logical fallacies backing up my assertions with scientific studies from trusted sources, why does my comment have -12 points without a single person taking the time to refute my position in a comment? I believe managed, licenced hunting in Africa supports conservation efforts, there is no reason ever to spank or hit a child, all children should be vaccinated, and p…

Just out of curiosity why do you think children should never be spanked? Do you have children?

I'm not going to say that spanking isn't an effective way to discipline a child. I can also understand if a 3 year old walks into a street to feel like spanking the child. There is overwhelming scientific evidence that other forms of discipline for small children are more effective at correcting behavior and children who are spanked are often more violent towards other children with other developmental and learning problems in school. Also, what we can do is look at how adjusted, happy, and successful people are in life, whether they are a doctor or lawyer with their own practice, divorced, in jail for violent crimes, or if they have a drug or psychological problems and compare that to whether they were spanked or worse as children. What we discover is that people who were not spanked or spanked very sparingly for example only in the case they walked out into the street do much, much better in life. So if you have children and want to play the numbers game, it might be worth while to explore other ways of disciplining your child. Not only do they work, but they have better long term effects on the child.

Re: How Facebook makes us dumber

#28

Post by eaandkw »

zappo2938 wrote: post #9

Reddit too. I just wrote 500 words without using any logical fallacies backing up my assertions with scientific studies from trusted sources, why does my comment have -12 points without a single person taking the time to refute my position in a comment? I believe managed, licenced hunting in Africa supports conservation efforts, there is no reason ever to spank or hit a child, all children should be vaccinated, and p…

Most people argue and make appeals to emotion not logic.

I have noticed this myself. I think it mostly comes from not knowing what or how to make an argument. For instance if I state a argument such as

Premise 1: All men are mortal. Premise 2: Socrates is a man. Conclusion: Therefore, Socrates is a mortal.

To refute my argument someone would have to demonstrate how my first two premises or my conclusion was wrong. Usually everyone just bashes the conclusions but never refutes the premises of the argument.

Re: How Facebook makes us dumber

#29

Post by sly_foxx »

What I don't get is dumb companies who post a link to their FB(or some other social media) page on their site:

1. You're advertising another company for free. Is Facebook paying you to put their logo on your site? No.

2. When people like/follow your page, they are trapped by FB(or some other social media) and you can only reach them there. If you're banned or they pull bait-and-switch on you, like Facebook did, you've wasted all this time building user base for Facebook and not building your business.

3. You can't even reach them on Facebook, because you now have to pay Facebook to reach people that have already liked your page.

4. Posting on social media wastes a lot of time and money(tools + people).

- Compare this to getting an email address from your visitors:

1. You are in control of your list.

2. You can reach them anywhere & anytime almost for free.

Re: How Facebook makes us dumber

#30

Post by raverbashing »

dest wrote: post #2

As a search provider, DuckDuckGo tries to prevent the "gated community" syndrom: http://dontbubble.us/

Yeah, too bad it fails at some searches and falling back to google is needed

For controversial stuff, the bubble is definitely a minus. For factual queries, it just makes things easier (yes, when I type 'python' I don't mean the reptile)

Post reply on HN