This is a beautiful page, but my god, is it heavy. I'm counting 171 separate requests totaling 31 Mb - excluding the videos. I've not even loaded all videos, and my total is at over 400 Mb now.... Is this acceptable now?
> This is a beautiful page, but my god, is it heavy I'm already looking forward to the Oculus Rift version :)
52 Places to Go in 2016
51–60 of 141 posts
Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
> This is a beautiful page, but my god, is it heavy I'm already looking forward to the Oculus Rift version :)
stop trying to make Oculus Rift a thing
Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#53It always amuses me that that it's "Turin, Italy" but "Providence, Rhode Island". I guess they assume an American audience but it's still strange that they don't mention the country for places in the US of A.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/08/nyregion/new-york-today-in...
Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#5453. Nepal.
Haha, they missed us this year? Nepal seems to have a permanent stranglehold on lists like these. It's not surprising, with the earthquake and the ('not a') blockade, they might have wanted to skip this year.
Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#55Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#56Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#57It always amuses me that that it's "Turin, Italy" but "Providence, Rhode Island". I guess they assume an American audience but it's still strange that they don't mention the country for places in the US of A.
I have no idea why an American newspaper, NYT or otherwise, would be writing for anything other than an American audience.
Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#58Having grown up in North Dakota, I am deeply confused why tourists would want to visit any part of it (#5). I'm shocked it shares a list with Barcelona and Carribean islands.
I'm interpreting the list as "52 places you might not have considered" because in each of their categories (national park, metro, attractions, etc.) many obvious - and IMO better - choices are avoided, at least for the US.
It's nice to see a list with places I never would have considered, even if it is odd to see ND and St. John on the same list.
Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#59Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016
#60Very short reviews of the places on the list that I've already seen: * Brno, Czech Republic - I stayed there just a few days, but even though pretty, the city wasn't very exciting. It's quite cheap and less touristic than Prague, so if you're looking for something less crowded than the capital, it might be a good choice to experience Czech culture * Barcelona, Spain - one of the most touristic places in Europe, but i…