Live data from Hacker News

52 Places to Go in 2016

nytimes.com

31–40 of 141 posts

Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016

#31
post #19

Very short reviews of the places on the list that I've already seen: * Brno, Czech Republic - I stayed there just a few days, but even though pretty, the city wasn't very exciting. It's quite cheap and less touristic than Prague, so if you're looking for something less crowded than the capital, it might be a good choice to experience Czech culture * Barcelona, Spain - one of the most touristic places in Europe, but i…

Somehow strange feeling to see Jerez [1] - my hometown - mentioned here in HN

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerez_de_la_Frontera

Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016

#32
It's interesting to see St Helena on the list. I hadn't realised the airport was actually being built, and is scheduled to open later this year.

I used to work with someone from St Helena. She was just 20 years old, and — understandably — didn't see much future for herself on the island. Perhaps the airport will change that, or at least mean she no longer needs to take two weeks holiday to visit her family by ship.

Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016

#33
post #22

The most polluting human activity is tourism.

False. Sustainable tourism is achievable and can bring good to the places you go.

Can bring good, yes. But mostly that just means money, which may drive clean up, may make some locals wealthy and others poor and/or displaced. It also brings, unfortunately, cultural imperialism and well, Starbucks.

Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016

#35
post #16

This is a beautiful page, but my god, is it heavy. I'm counting 171 separate requests totaling 31 Mb - excluding the videos. I've not even loaded all videos, and my total is at over 400 Mb now.... Is this acceptable now?

I hate the cruft on simple news articles, but I am completely fine in this case for a special feature like this. The images/videos were beautiful and all served a purpose, and it was mostly lazy-loaded. Yes some initial load time, but a very good user experience.

Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016

#36

Number 3 on the list is Malta, and I just have to add that one of the best books I have ever read is "The Great Siege: Malta 1565" [1]. It's quite short, but absolutely fascinating. I wrote this in my Amazon review of it: The story of the siege of Malta in 1565 is absolutely riveting. The Knights of St John, with Grand Master de la Valette, and the Maltese population are attacked and besieged by the numerically super…

There was also the Siege of Malta in WW2:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Malta_%28World_War_II...

Edit: The entire population of Malta was awarded the George Cross (UK highest gallantry award for civilians) for their actions in WWW2:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Award_of_the_George_Cross_to_M...

Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016

#37
post #22

The most polluting human activity is tourism.

False. Sustainable tourism is achievable and can bring good to the places you go.

It can, but more often than not it destroys the thing it is all about.

See: turtles in Greece, quiet beaches and so on.

Nothing like a thundering herd of humans with power gadgets coming in by plane to package holidays centered around hastily constructed hotels and other infrastructure (airports, for instance).

Re: 52 Places to Go in 2016

#39
post #6

Having grown up in North Dakota, I am deeply confused why tourists would want to visit any part of it (#5). I'm shocked it shares a list with Barcelona and Carribean islands.

Haven't been to North Dakota, but a few years ago I went to Montana (parts look very similar to the picture they included). It was almost by chance I went, didn't really have a hand in planning the trip but-

It was absolutely breath-taking, and I won't forget how it felt to stand in those hilly fields for a long time. Being at the exact same spot as the Battle of Little Big Horn, walking in quiet with no cell phone signal... It was all wonderful.

Post reply on HN