Live data from Hacker News

Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

recode.net

91–100 of 305 posts

Re: Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

#91
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, thank God they didn't force that crap onto me, yet. If they'll do I have to switch clients -.-

What difference would the client make? The feed comes from the API, even in the official client [1]. [1] Few years ago I'm sure it was like that, they might've changed to a private API since.

A client could periodically poll for new tweets and sort them by timestamp.

Re: Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

#92
post #84

I feel like this could work out quite well, so long as they preserve the spirit of Twitter's original 140 char limit. That could be handled as simply as: The first 140 characters are shown (just like they are today), but there's a "see more" button/icon/etc. that expands the tweet to longer form. That would seem to solve both issues -- short-and-sweet for those that want it, and longer as necessary. (Note this idea h…

This would just lead to 'click-bait' tweets.

Re: Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

#93

The problem isn't character limit. The problem is missing interesting Tweets. My timeline is flooded with new tweets. Better flagging to read later, algorithms that say you might find this most interesting, filtering would be welcome and are needed.

I still don't really understand Twitter. I have an account and have followed ~50 people and organizations I find interesting, and all I see is floods of re-tweets of people I have no interest in.

Re: Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

#95

The problem isn't character limit. The problem is missing interesting Tweets. My timeline is flooded with new tweets. Better flagging to read later, algorithms that say you might find this most interesting, filtering would be welcome and are needed.

> Better flagging to read later

Can you expand on that? Do the tweets contain links, or do they just pack enough meaning into 140 characters that you'd like to think about it for some time before replying?

Personally, I think that anything that needs to be bookmarked later like that belongs in an RSS feed.

Re: Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

#96

Twitter could charge 1¢ for each character over 140. That will encourage people to (still) be concise, but also monetize people (or companies) that want to say more.

The best suggestion I've seen is 1¢ for the 141st character, 2¢ for the 142nd, 4¢ for the 143rd, etc. Going slightly over 140 costs a trivial amount, but it would be stupidly expensive to tweet anything really long.

EDIT: I found where I stole this idea from: http://www.interfluidity.com/v2/6207.html

Re: Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

#97

The problem isn't character limit. The problem is missing interesting Tweets. My timeline is flooded with new tweets. Better flagging to read later, algorithms that say you might find this most interesting, filtering would be welcome and are needed.

It would be nice if we could somehow follow based on more specific filters ... like combination of user and topic.

Recently I wanted to follow a well known Java Evangelist, but their Java tweets were mixed with lots of politics tweets. Even though I agreed with the politics, I only wanted to read the Java related stuff - but it was like drinking from a firehose so I gave up.

And also being able to disable retweets for Lists would be nice too.

Re: Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

#98

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The length of your entire message: 285 chars Length of " You can't express complex thought without multi-tweeting ": 56 chars (took " literally " out, because that's incorrect).

"Literally" is not incorrect. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literally "Literally" can mean "virtually," or "figuratively."

Yes and this is unfortunate but modern.

Re: Twitter Considering 10,000-Character Limit for Tweets

#99

The problem isn't character limit. The problem is missing interesting Tweets. My timeline is flooded with new tweets. Better flagging to read later, algorithms that say you might find this most interesting, filtering would be welcome and are needed.

> Better flagging to read later Can you expand on that? Do the tweets contain links, or do they just pack enough meaning into 140 characters that you'd like to think about it for some time before replying? Personally, I think that anything that needs to be bookmarked later like that belongs in an RSS feed.

Links, videos, and potentially interesting discussions that may result.

The last point also touches on an issue I have with the Twitter Android client: there's no way to refresh a tweet to see new replies. Even if I go back to my timeline and tap on the tweet again, it'll just show whatever it has in the local cache. Normally that's good behavior, but a pull-to-refresh (an action patented by Twitter, no less) would be absolutely ideal.

Post reply on HN