Live data from Hacker News

My 'smart drugs' nightmare

bbc.co.uk

1–10 of 55 posts

Re: My 'smart drugs' nightmare

#3
"The following day, a train journey presented what I expected to be a perfect opportunity to get some work done with the aid of a smart pill. I was wrong.

I became distracted - more so than normal. While the drug made me focus, it was on the wrong things - such as playing video games on my smartphone."

That's because of something called the Yerkes-Dodson curve which basically says if your body is not aroused enough then your performance decreases, and if it's overly aroused then you can't focus on anything. This applies to well-learned tasks or other things that depend mostly on cognitive abilities (differently shaped for different types of tasks). It sounds like the author didn't need to take modafinil because he was already good at concentrating on things and taking it just put him on the far end of the curve and destroyed his performance.

Re: My 'smart drugs' nightmare

#4
This isn't a drug you just jump right into. If you're interested in nootropics, it's smarter to test the waters with simple stuff like choline (preferably in the form of citicoline of alpha GPC) and ALCAR (acetyl L-Carnitine), then slowly considering a racetam like piracetam or noopept.

You need to know how you respond to the easy stuff first. This guy jumped right into the deep end without looking.

Re: My 'smart drugs' nightmare

#5
Anecdote: I also experimented with modafinil and found that though it made me more energetic physically, it was just as likely to distract me as it was to help me focus.

Upon reflection about how poorly sleep/wakefulness/daydreaming is understood, I decided that I didn't want to guinea-pig myself with biological forces out of my depth.

Re: My 'smart drugs' nightmare

#8
Taking Modafinil for funzies is a bad idea, but this doesn't rise to the level of "nightmare."

Unless you have nightmares about developing a rash and getting a poor night's sleep.

Post reply on HN