Live data from Hacker News

Netflix is on Fire

medium.com

91–100 of 164 posts

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#91
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Netflix has a different catalogue for each country they serve.

I recently learned this first hand. Even more confusingly, your account is not attached to your country of payment but instead done by geoip, so travelling will mean you likely can't continue to watch the same series. This is a major ballache. Even netflix support don't realise this.

Yeah, but you can VPN to wherever you want and access that country's catalog.

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#92
post #8

Brit here wondering how this shift within the industry will affect the BBC. We own a screen, Netflix subscription and Chromecast, and do not pay for a TV License. While this setup is not even remotely commonplace yet, it could be a real threat over the next decade, especially as iPlayer usage is free without owning a License. I would like to see the TV License flipped on its head: you pay a subscription that gets you…

I thought you had to pay the tax for any screen, regardless of where the content comes from?

To be very specific you need a TV licence if you consume a "broadcast signal".

Meaning that anything that is live, or recorded from a live signal, requires a TV licence - whether or not it came from an over-the-air signal or via an IP service.

But if you consume a catch-up TV service, or watch DVDs, or use Netflix... then you do not need a TV licence.

Aside from the person I know who works at the BBC, no-one I know now has a TV licence, just as no-one I know has a land-line telephone. Modern technology (smart TVs and smart DVD players mostly) have obliterated old style viewing.

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#93
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure that that's really the issue. The music industry has solved all those problems long ago - I can buy a lossless version of practically any album, free of DRM and knowing that those files will be mine and forever playable. Here in europe, and I'm assuming the US as well, there's no way to buy and own a movie or TV show in a similar way. It's either DRM or physical media, usually accompanied by long delays…

I haven't found lossless music to be easy to come by legally, am I missing some large site? Amazon for instance only sells MP3s.

Tidal sells FLAC, they charge you for it but it's there. I think they're around 30m tracks now.

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#94
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And yet, you can get around those restrictions quite easily.

Or you can torrent it quite easily and don't pay a dime. The point is : if I have to do illegal stuff (getting around geoip is against TOS) and start installing software, search on the internet for a tutorial to learn how to watch my stuff, I might as well look for "House of cards torrent", it's faster and cheaper. I can pirate any music I want, yet I pay Apple Music $10/month to get it because it's easy, the UI is n…

You are still paying the content creators if you bypass the geoblock and pay the monthly subscription fee. And that fee is not at all onerous.

In Australia, all the streaming providers have the problems of not being able to show all content. There is stuff in Australia that we can't watch at all. Bypassing Geoblocks makes me a citizen of the entire world, which I gladly pay for.

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#95

While I think it's pretty f *ing obvious that traditional TV channels are going to be in a lot of trouble in the years to come, I couldn't verify his statement that "Netflix now produces 3 of the top 5 rated video series according to Rotten Tomatoes". I did find the exact list he posted under "Top TV Comedies" http://www.rottentomatoes.com/browse/tv-list-2/# Also, on their "Top 10 TV Shows 2015", I only see two Netfl…

Unless I'm missing something, your link does match his list, but it's labeled "Top TV Shows on RT", not comedy. Most of those shows are definitely not comedy.

Fair point on them not being comedies. This could be an RT issue. This is what I see:

http://imgur.com/PdqztD9

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#96
Why is the argument framed as Netflix against the other TV companies? That is wrong. I don't think people care who makes the show as long as its good and available/accessible. They will all change one way or the other. Their viability in the long run will depend on how good their online offerings are. We are still in the nascent stages of this.

The big issue here is the service providers like Comcast will be relegated to becoming purely pipe providers as they are supposed to be. They are getting hit from both ends by Google and Netflix.

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#97
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The BBC's big threat just now is probably not the Internet, but the current Government. It's already lost £.75bn of its budget, and some conservatives would like to ban the BBC from producing popular content.

I really don't know how to parse that last sentence. What is the logic (or lack thereof) there? I don't keep up with what the BBC gets done to it by the UK government.

Popular in this context means programmes created for pure entertainment, i.e. not news / current affairs / documentary / educational / etc. It doesn't mean that the BBC wouldn't be able to produce programmes that draw in an audience.

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#98
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The BBC's big threat just now is probably not the Internet, but the current Government. It's already lost £.75bn of its budget, and some conservatives would like to ban the BBC from producing popular content.

I really don't know how to parse that last sentence. What is the logic (or lack thereof) there? I don't keep up with what the BBC gets done to it by the UK government.

The Government have made the BBC cover the cost of free TV licenses, which means their budget for actual content is now £750m smaller. And there has been the suggestion that the BBC be banned from making entertainment programmes like The Voice, which would ensure the company is less popular with the public and less likely to garner sympathy in future.

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#99
post #40

Don't know if the catalogue is the same here in the UK than in the US, but in the UK Netflix is only good for TV shows. The movie offering is very light. The other thing is the lack of offline viewing, which is useful when travelling. The media industry is so backward. I can't believe most of them still live in the 90s and these problems haven't been solved yet.

>The media industry is so backward. I can't believe most of them still live in the 90s and these problems haven't been solved yet. Part of the problem is the broken status of international copyright law and the many incompatible local laws and regulations. If the international community could at least settle for an standard approach to digital distribution over the internet, the world would be a happier place for con…

Isn't that one of the points of TPP, so hated by HN?

Re: Netflix is on Fire

#100
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The BBC's big threat just now is probably not the Internet, but the current Government. It's already lost £.75bn of its budget, and some conservatives would like to ban the BBC from producing popular content.

I really don't know how to parse that last sentence. What is the logic (or lack thereof) there? I don't keep up with what the BBC gets done to it by the UK government.

No real logic. All politics. The BBC is publicly funded and an enormous success, which is an embarrassment to those singing from the free market hymn sheet. But also, it's obviously a direct competitor to other media companies in the UK, who are very politically powerful (Murdoch, for example).

Same goes for our national health service, which is currently being gutted for the same reasons.

Post reply on HN