Live data from Hacker News

“Corn-Pone Opinions” by Mark Twain (1901)

paulgraham.com

11–20 of 63 posts

Re: “Corn-Pone Opinions” by Mark Twain (1901)

#11
post #8

Here's what I have to say about that: That's pretty rich, coming from you, Paul Graham. You have All The Money, and All The Respect amongst your large and powerful peer group. Given your considerable wealth, there's nothing anybody can do to negatively impact your life in any meaningful way. Yet you continue to bang the same drum you've been banging for a decade now, at least. Time to tell us something we don't alrea…

Paul Graham didn't write it.

yeah. twain wrote literature. paul graham writes like someone convinced that he has found the most efficient means of communication.

Re: “Corn-Pone Opinions” by Mark Twain (1901)

#13
post #3

I like how Emerson felt about conformity, not to mention - to be exceptional, one must be a non-conformist. Many would rather be accepted than exceptional At some point in your life, you may have to make that choice. The problem with public opinion in our times is this idea that the crowd is always right. Something is true because the crowd says it is. The crowd saying it is, makes it true. Sane is not the same as tr…

>When the lone "insane" person is vindicated, great wealth and success seem to follow. I must not have been paying attention. When did that ever happen?

When someone sees a market inefficiency that everyone else was ignoring, and then solves it, they are in position to collect economic rents until others catch up. The problem that was solved was not imaginary, it was real, and people are suddenly able to pay to remove this problem. This is clear throughout history as first movers have successfully implemented local monopolies with varying degrees of scale.

Re: “Corn-Pone Opinions” by Mark Twain (1901)

#16
post #3

I like how Emerson felt about conformity, not to mention - to be exceptional, one must be a non-conformist. Many would rather be accepted than exceptional At some point in your life, you may have to make that choice. The problem with public opinion in our times is this idea that the crowd is always right. Something is true because the crowd says it is. The crowd saying it is, makes it true. Sane is not the same as tr…

> Many would rather be accepted than exceptional. At some point in your life, you may have to make that choice.

I think that there are two problems with this. (EDIT: 'Problems' is a bad word. I don't mean two things that make it wrong, but rather two things that require a careful reading to appreciate fully. I should have said 'subtleties'.)

First, and most importantly, I think that people think that being exceptional is a choice. Thus, someone says "ah, I shall be exceptional!", and sits back and waits to become so. Being exceptional is not a choice; becoming exceptional is, though it is a slow process, subject to setbacks, and not guaranteed of even eventual success (unless—as is perhaps uniquely appropriate here—one is willing to move the goalposts when necessary, and find success where one is).

Second, I take your explicit point to be the decision between being accepted and being exceptional, but I'll respond as if it were between being conformist and being exceptional (which I took to be the subtext). After the problem is surmounted of deciding just to be exceptional, and realising that one must become so, I think that sometimes people confuse blind non-conformity with reasoned non-conformity. That is, a decision not to conform just in order not to be part of the crowd is just as silly as a decision to conform to be part of the crowd. Rather, make your decisions as you will, regardless of the pressure of the crowds, with the idea that you will sometimes agree with and (probably) more often disagree with them, and become exceptional in that way.

Re: “Corn-Pone Opinions” by Mark Twain (1901)

#18
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>When the lone "insane" person is vindicated, great wealth and success seem to follow. I must not have been paying attention. When did that ever happen?

When someone sees a market inefficiency that everyone else was ignoring, and then solves it, they are in position to collect economic rents until others catch up. The problem that was solved was not imaginary, it was real, and people are suddenly able to pay to remove this problem. This is clear throughout history as first movers have successfully implemented local monopolies with varying degrees of scale.

> When someone sees a market inefficiency that everyone else was ignoring, and then solves it, they are in position to collect economic rents until others catch up.

PG, for example: http://www.paulgraham.com/avg.html . :-)

Post reply on HN