Live data from Hacker News

The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

blog.randi.io

91–100 of 232 posts

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#91
post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So your answer is not to have enforceable routes for women to be safe and respected because nobody can write specifically enough? I run an organization (hypatia.software [Hypatia Software Organization]) where the Code of Conduct is enforced and it is effective .

No, my answer is to have a community where you ban those people without discussing the semantics of some sentence. In the end, it's probably equivalent to your answer. Because when the people in your organization feel someone is harassing people and you decide to kick him out, you're probably simply describing his behaviour and referencing your CoC, but not doing some detailed analysis how and why he did so.

Yeah, it's just that it is sad that it is practically required to be spelled out. But even bigger yet, is that we have to find ways to enforce it and its purpose.

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#92
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How is this about making money?

For all the hate in GG, it's a anonymous/pseudo anonymous mob on the internet. It seems hate is the default language of the louder minority. Somehow, not surprising really, the loudest people are also the worst. On the pro-GG side, look at the supposedly pro-gg websites that have sprung up that sell things or review things basically do everything that they are saying the current status quo is doing wrongly or unethic…

Thank you for responding.

> If you look at it from an outside perspective, both sides are right.

That's kinda how it feels to me. In most of the conflicts I've read about, one side is right (look at this - if what she writes is true - and there's no reason for me to believe otherwise, how would you reasonably argue against that?, but then I read about "safe spaces" at universities and can only think how dumb of an idea this is), but instead of a civilized discussion which might actually change people's opinions, a shirtstorm ensues.

Please disagree with me if you think that I'm wrong on this - I'm really just an outsider who occasionally reads about this on Twitter and shakes his head.

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#93
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No one has the "right" to threaten someone's safety. That right simply doesn't exist. No form of free speech rules grant such "right".

That's why it's in quotes.

How the hell is gamergate about the "right" to threaten? No one who isn't a troll will argue that anyone has that right. What do games have to do with the right to threaten?

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#94
Thanks for the vicious attach. I consider myself as 'GamerGate' and like MOST of that community haven't participated in any such 'toxic' non-sense. I get it, you hate some bad people who try to cling to a name for recognition, but just broadly labeling the whole group as such, when literally your only evidence is of a few notable individuals is a bit unsettling.

In reality, the waters are a bit dirty on both sides. That 'useful tool' you mention was literally a blacklist. If you had actually opened up the github page and looked at the code you would have seen ample comments in their calling it as such. Also, it literally just blocked thousands of people based off of an idea of guilt by association. Now, people wanting to block people is their own prerogative, but let's call things what they actually are.

The vicious attacks by Breitbart are certainly not fair to her. But to play devil's advocate, she herself is not exactly known for holding back when it comes to literally anyone who disagrees with her, even politely. I don't think it's right on either side, but I also can't see myself jumping to the aid of someone for a slight against them, when they've done the same/similar to others.

The swatting thing is horrible. It's a dirty tactic that is VERY dangerous and those responsible should be jailed for it. However, their is also the possibility that the swatting thing was faked. Read it or not (it's RalphRetort so you'll probably ignore it) but here is an article that shows some other bits of info that allude to her maybe faking this, especially considering the timing of the incident.

The broad stroke argument that GamerGate (because it's some sort of entity, right?) 'targets' ALL women in tech just doesn't make any sense. If you actually followed these things, you would know that there is in fact a lot of disgusting harassment that goes on. But guess what, it's not GamerGate, and it's not even 'anti-GG', it's third-party groups like GNAA and what not who are very open about how they do those things to get GG and anti-GG at each others throats because they think it's funny. In all reality, outside of the gross methods used, the end result is a bit sad/funny. There are two large groups of people who in all reality are very similar, that largely hate each other because neither like to actually fact check and see WHO is actually doing the harassment.

Who on either side has been arrested for all of this illegal activity (The harassment being the illegal activity)? Nobody, and that's because it's all a big conflated mess that is incredibly hard for those involved to piece together, let alone outsiders who haven't been even remotely involved.

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not clear what the difference between mod and user flagging is. It's not clear that it matters. If the users are flagging it, then they are taking sides.

Not being particularly interested in the moderation processes at hacker news, all I can say is that this flagging and it's effects does not reflect well on hacker news or it's users. In fact, this sort of feature looks like it's used for supression. Edited to add, since reply now seems to be broken for me : There is no "enable showdead" in my user profile settings, despite having registered more than a year ago. I pr…

That doesn't show up?

https://imgur.com/MPZP7H5

I'm sure that has been there from the first day on HN for me, so it would be odd if it didn't for you.

EDIT: and you can always reply from an individual comments page, I think the reply-link shows only up after a while for nested links (I guess the theory is to avoid getting to deeply nested comment trees to quickly?)

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#96
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For all the hate in GG, it's a anonymous/pseudo anonymous mob on the internet. It seems hate is the default language of the louder minority. Somehow, not surprising really, the loudest people are also the worst. On the pro-GG side, look at the supposedly pro-gg websites that have sprung up that sell things or review things basically do everything that they are saying the current status quo is doing wrongly or unethic…

Thank you for responding. > If you look at it from an outside perspective, both sides are right. That's kinda how it feels to me. In most of the conflicts I've read about, one side is right (look at this - if what she writes is true - and there's no reason for me to believe otherwise, how would you reasonably argue against that?, but then I read about "safe spaces" at universities and can only think how dumb of an id…

Please trust me when I say safe spaces are crucial, especially to trans survival.

I wish you knew how... devastatingly lonely it can be as an outcast in society. How everyone treats you. Solidarity is really important.

Can you also imagine who you are constantly being criticized? Your problems constantly being made out to be false? That you have the burden of proof with everyone because nobody knows your struggle?

I feel like the most important takehome is that we need recourse for ensuring the safety of the less represented of people, e.g., trans.

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#97
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't follow you on that last bit, about noticing how she didn't mention the username. I feel like you mean to imply something, but maybe I'm not following?

I like that she didn't, since it emphasizes that this is not about that particular conflict, but the way it has been handled. She could have mentioned his name in an effort to make him look bad (this post will probably get a lot of attention), but she didn't.

ahh, thanks for clarifying, wasn't sure if you were implying something else.

In regards to your question, yes things got bad, unfortunately what is hard to see from the outside, is that the vast majority of the harassment was originally done by outside third parties who just wanted to troll two groups. They harassed some people (mostly women) then said they were part of GamerGate. This wasn't even remotely true, and they admitted to this. Unfortunately the other side got caught up in the harassment and the claim that was done by GamerGate to ever actually think, "Why would this person who is harassing me (which is illegal) mention they were part of GamerGate (which was originally about Games Media, and had literally nothing to do with women in tech)?"

Follow that up with lots of mudslinging on both sides, and neither side being that willing to 'dig-deep' into the facts, and you get a year long 'cyber-war' between two groups of people who probably have much more in common than they think.

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#98
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What does this have to do with GamerGate? This is a feminist talking about an MRA, neither of those things are GamerGate... I feel like you have conflated the issues a bit maybe?

She has, like a lot of women, been harassed by GamerGate. They actually sent a police SWAT team to break down her door (which they didn't). http://blog.randi.io/2015/04/03/swated/ She's been viciously attacked in Breitbart, a far right-wing site that championed GamerGate's hounding of women in tech. She also created a useful tool to block GamerGate hate attacks on Twitter. It's the sort of thing a lot of women could…

So your sources are a clickbait rag, Randi Harper (notorious crybully) and an article which contains no evidence of GamerGate doing anything but instead an article with 4chan not actually doing anything but being 4chan.

Well, I'm sold.

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#99
post #38

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Randi wanted a person crucified…" I didn't see that in the article, could you point us to that information?

"Crucified" is an obvious exaggeration, but the article does contain "Last, I wanted this developer removed from the project and the IRC channel." I don't know anything about what happened here more than what's public, but it's totally imaginable to me that if you make that an ultimatum, and the project leadership hasn't given itself a reasonable way to do that, it's difficult for them to respond usefully. Maybe the…

I'm sorry, but this post (yours) and the original post (kev009's) seem like unreasonable exaggerations. Emphasis on the "unreasonable". Unreasonable exaggerations of other people's viewpoints fosters low-quality discussion, which is why I don't like it.

Banning is a common response to harassment. Hacker News uses it, we even have multiple types of banning, including the shadowban and hellban. We know that "crucifixion" is hyperbolical language, and we can ordinarily forgive someone for being hyperbolical, but in this case it's simply an unreasonable exaggeration.

The same applies to your use of the term "ultimatum". That's an unreasonable exaggeration. It depicts the contents of the original article inaccurately. She detailed no consequences nor threatened retaliation in her request that a user be banned. You can call it a "demand" instead of a "request", but "ultimatum" is simply incorrect.

Honestly, I can understand and relate to both her request and the core developers' response, but I'm not convinced that a code of conduct is a prerequisite for banning abusive community members. Explicit political authority is great, but we shouldn't be automatically afraid to use implicit political authority.

Re: The Developer Formerly Known as FreeBSDGirl

#100
post #3

She's talking about some guy and his "campaign to legalize rape". I thought she was exaggerating or maybe misunderstanding something. Sure, this guy is probably an asshole, but legalizing rape, come on! I followed the link and... it is kind of almost entertaining. He means it. Literally. You can't stop reading that trainwreck of an argument, because it gets worse and worse. And then you've lost all hope in mankind. I…

"He means it. Literally."

No, rooshv was dripping with sarcasm.

Post reply on HN