Teach Yourself Logic 2016: A Study Guide [pdf]

Is there a non-login required link?

Edit: Here, http://www.logicmatters.net/tyl/

I'm studying logic, myself. I'm about halfway through Sweet Reason, by Henle & Tomoczyko. Anyone who wants to study logic owes it to himself to become familiar with traditional Aristotelian logic as well as modern symbolic logic.

Henry B. Veatch is one author to look up on this (if you can find affordable used copies of his works). The principle textbook for traditional logic that's still in print is Socratic Logic by Peter Kreeft. Be aware that he is sharply critical of symbolic logic. It's good to be aware of the issues involved; in particular, the paradoxes of material implication. When symbolic logic was being developed, many of its supporters looked disparagingly on traditional logic. Few logicians take that view, anymore.

Symbolic logic won the fight, but traditional logic won the argument. By the former, I mean that symbolic logic is taught nearly to the exclusion of traditional logic. By the latter, I mean that the objections made by the old guard are seen by everyone as valid and are being addressed by the new logic. For example, in traditional logic, the conclusion follows with real necessity from the premises as an effect follows from a cause. Modern logic has revived the study of modal logic in order to deal such things as necessity and possibility.

Furthermore, while symbolic logic is superior for mathematical proofs and technical philosophy, traditional syllogistic logic is better suited for everyday life and verbal arguments; it is the Newtonian mechanics of logic.

Luckily, the author himself wrote one! http://www.logicmatters.net/tyl/shorter-tyl/

Are there any MOOCs on Logic in the same spirit as this Guide?

Can you say more on the fight between traditional and symbolic logic? I'm glad to hear that classical logic is making a comeback, though it's news to me.