Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, it's the problem for maybe 1% of developers (to pull a "sufficiently tiny to make my point, but still made up" number out of thin air). There is still plenty of money to be made that doesn't conflict with the default functionality of the iPhone. Don't get me wrong, I'd rather there was no filtering at all and there was instead a sort of "paid apps have the option of getting Apple Certification and being listed…
I've developed 10 different apps. 2 of them have gotten the Apple axe. It's way above 1%.
McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
61–70 of 79 posts
Re: McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, it's the problem for maybe 1% of developers (to pull a "sufficiently tiny to make my point, but still made up" number out of thin air). There is still plenty of money to be made that doesn't conflict with the default functionality of the iPhone. Don't get me wrong, I'd rather there was no filtering at all and there was instead a sort of "paid apps have the option of getting Apple Certification and being listed…
I've developed 10 different apps. 2 of them have gotten the Apple axe. It's way above 1%.
Re: McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, it's the problem for maybe 1% of developers (to pull a "sufficiently tiny to make my point, but still made up" number out of thin air). There is still plenty of money to be made that doesn't conflict with the default functionality of the iPhone. Don't get me wrong, I'd rather there was no filtering at all and there was instead a sort of "paid apps have the option of getting Apple Certification and being listed…
I've developed 10 different apps. 2 of them have gotten the Apple axe. It's way above 1%.
Neither you nor your parent have any statistical basis for your estimates. As of early this month [1], there are over 100,000 applications in the app store. If 1% were rejected, that means that 1,010 apps were rejected. Your two apps could easily fall into that category.
Basically, all we can know is that many apps get accepted, but not all of them do. Any more clarity than that requires Apple's intervention (which I don't expect to see any time soon).
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/App_Store#Number_of_launched_ap...
Re: McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm confused...is it a well known thing that Jobs' car has no plates? Is that legal?
Surprisingly, yes. In California, apparently, there is a provision in the motor-vehicle code that allows 'celebrities' (for some definition of 'celebrity') to drive around without license plates.
Re: McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Surprisingly, yes. In California, apparently, there is a provision in the motor-vehicle code that allows 'celebrities' (for some definition of 'celebrity') to drive around without license plates.
won't driving without a license plate just single you out as a celebrity then?
Re: McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is that there is a hell of a lot of general purpose software out there already that's never going to be worth the effort to port to a single device. The iPhone has some nice apps, but runs nothing important to me in my professional life. And if the new tablet isn't going to be a useful work tool, why would I want it?
What's your profession, and what tablet/phone apps might be helpful but not yet available?
I'd love to replace my netbook with sleek little tablet, but the odds of Apple selling something that runs Java, Ruby, or emacs is slim-to-none.
Re: McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have to disagree: have you seen the money students drop on textbooks lately? The whole market has consolidated and now makes books worthless after only a year or two (hence small secondary market) by releasing new revisions with different exercises in them. Maybe publishing at large doesn't know their business, but the textbook companies are minting money.
The textbook publishers had better gather their rosebuds while they may, because that scam isn't going to work forever.
Re: McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
#68You are all very, very good little consumers. And Apple doesn't even have to pay you for generating it's hype.
Re: McGraw-Hill CEO: "The tablet is going to be just really terrific"
#69Earlier quoted context omitted.
these are the guys that run the textbook market. ill go with option 1.
I have to disagree: have you seen the money students drop on textbooks lately? The whole market has consolidated and now makes books worthless after only a year or two (hence small secondary market) by releasing new revisions with different exercises in them. Maybe publishing at large doesn't know their business, but the textbook companies are minting money.