Live data from Hacker News

Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

bbc.com

21–30 of 167 posts

Re: Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

#21
post #8

Am sure when the first cars hit the road, similar news made it to the newspaper front pages then.

Funny story, heard Marc Andreessen once saying:

During the early days, whenever a horse cart came in opposite direction to a car, the car owner was supposed to disassemble the car and hide behind a bush before the horse came near.

We have come a long way :)

Re: Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

#22
post #7

It was an official TV-video-quadcopter from an Italian local TV company. The FIS was initially okay with it. The quadcopter operater has a pilot license and was suposed to fly only in a specific corridor with no visitors nor athletes underneath. Though, the quadcopter (intentionally?) left the corridore several times in the minutes before the crash (for better videos?). https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl…

Wow, it was news for me that athletes wear airbags.

Re: Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

#23
post #7

It was an official TV-video-quadcopter from an Italian local TV company. The FIS was initially okay with it. The quadcopter operater has a pilot license and was suposed to fly only in a specific corridor with no visitors nor athletes underneath. Though, the quadcopter (intentionally?) left the corridore several times in the minutes before the crash (for better videos?). https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl…

Looks like the italians have something against us austrians..

Re: Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

#24
I used to fly remote control aeroplanes as a hobby. There's a really strong culture of having a licence and insurance before you're allowed to fly solo. You have to pass a test before you can get insurance, and there are more tests if you want to fly around spectators (stunt shows, etc).

This seems to be completely missing in the drone community. I quizzed some drone enthusiasts about it and they responded with "meh", touting that they have home insurance and it doesn't matter.

Re: Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

#27
post #19

Has anyone actually been killed by a non military drone yet?

I haven't read the FAA regulations in extreme detail, but from what I've surmised, RC copters would count as needing to be registered. So if that makes it a drone -- and I don't see why not, as it is an unmanned aircraft and whether it had a camera or not doesn't seem to matter to the FAA -- then yes, people have been killed by them. I remember in Brooklyn a couple years back a teenager was killed quite gruesomely in a public park by his own RC copter: http://nypost.com/2013/09/05/man-decapitated-by-remote-contr...

Re: Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

#28
post #20

Bad risk taking drone pilots are incredibly irritating, because they will ruin it for the decent pilots.

This is very relevant to your comment. "In social psychology, the fundamental attribution error, also known as the correspondence bias or attribution effect, is the tendency for people to place an undue emphasis on internal characteristics (personality) to explain someone else's behavior in a given situation rather than considering the situation's external factors."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error

Re: Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

#29
Seems like a malfunction on a homemade rig. Possibly throttle cutout when descending?

Why the pilot would insist on using this on what seems like a professional job is beyond me. The industry is coalescing around a couple of field tested professional rigs (DJI products for instance). I hate all these FAA regulations around stuff people do in their backyards but at a professional event like this (with this many people around), it seems like a no-brainer that air worthiness should be tightly regulated.

Source: been building drones for 5 years.

EDIT: This is Europe. So EASA not FAA

Re: Skier almost hit by camera drone in World Cup slalom

#30

I think the title should be updated a bit here. When I read "drone nearly hits" I imagined it flying by and getting to close on the way passed. The video shows it crashing to the ground with some force. It isn't clear whether this is under its own power (so an issue in directional control by either a pilot error or equipment fault) or due to loss of power (so it hit the ground due to gravity). Either way it could hav…

The drone in the video seems to be flying like a brick; complete engine shutdown, IMNSHO. If any of the four rotors were operating, the vector would be significantly different.

As to why "it's raining drones, hallelujah" - too early for that; I very much doubt there's enough of a data recorder to reconstruct the event, even with a commercial-grade drone.

Post reply on HN