Worth mentioning Amethyst for OS X, I've been using it for a year with a 3 monitor setup with no problems. https://ianyh.com/amethyst/ and https://github.com/puffnfresh/Honer.app
I use Amethyst everyday and it is excellent.
Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
41–50 of 76 posts
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#42That's the way I prefer to use i3 on Linux, and it would be nice to find something like that for OSX.
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish Apple would fully commit to tiling. We now have a situation where you can make an app full screen, if it supports it. Or you can have two apps side-by-side, if both apps support that. You can't go 'almost' full-screen - as in 'full-screen, but leave me the menubar' without something like Spectacle. I'm not even sure if keyboard shortcuts are available for split-screen, or if you can split two windows from the…
Hm? The menu bar exists in fullscreen apps. Move your mouse to the top and it will appear.
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
I used to use bspwm, but ended up moving back to i3wm. While i3wm is not perfect, I always found it to be more practical than bspwm. The ability to stack, for example, is very nice. What's the thing that you really like about bspwm? As much as I wanted to really like bspwm, when it came to using it for work, I just found it lacked something.
Curious, what issues do you have with i3? Have been using it for a few years, really hits the sweet spot of easy-config + awesome functionality (stacked terminal windows with remote server load averages piped through title bar are a real nice-to-have for example). Floatable dock (i.e. scratchpad) is also pretty handy for skype, music player, notes, etc. Only issue that's really bothered me is a minor one: with stacke…
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#45See also Spectacle: https://www.spectacleapp.com/ Maybe not the most configurable but in return you get something that works out of the box and doesn't require you to read 38 pages of README.
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#46Worth mentioning Amethyst for OS X, I've been using it for a year with a 3 monitor setup with no problems. https://ianyh.com/amethyst/ and https://github.com/puffnfresh/Honer.app
It's not obvious from the Amethyst page that it's open source: https://github.com/ianyh/Amethyst (looks to be the MIT licence)
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#47Worth mentioning Amethyst for OS X, I've been using it for a year with a 3 monitor setup with no problems. https://ianyh.com/amethyst/ and https://github.com/puffnfresh/Honer.app
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#48Long term amethyst user here, this looks really awesome. OUt of the box i feels much more like some of the linux tiling window managers and less like a hack.
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#49Hammerspoon is a less complicated fork of it: https://github.com/Hammerspoon/hammerspoon
My config: https://github.com/colindean/mjolnir-config
Re: Kwm, tiling window manager for OS X
#50Worth mentioning Amethyst for OS X, I've been using it for a year with a 3 monitor setup with no problems. https://ianyh.com/amethyst/ and https://github.com/puffnfresh/Honer.app
I'd be curious to know how this software compares with Amethyst. I've also been using Amethyst for some time with no problems, but it is sometimes a bit sluggish. I have so far assumed this has more to do with unavoidable limitations in the OS X gui ecosystem. It is written in Objective-C, is available on homebrewa and has a binary distribution available, provides a gui configuration manager, and seems to include all…
It's been a long time since I've actually written any C++, but briefly looking through the code it looks like it's making some of the same assumptions I made that resulted in some strange problems like the dreaded fullscreen bug (https://github.com/ianyh/Amethyst/issues/254). That said, some of those assumptions were made 3 OS X versions ago so things might have improved.
It does, however, look a lot lighter weight than Amethyst is, and it looks like it does a better job at aggressively caching. It also supports binary space partitioning, which Amethyst doesn't support yet (https://github.com/ianyh/Amethyst/issues/255). If I'm reading it correctly, though, that's the only thing it supports.
All in all, it seems like a great project. We could probably learn some things from each other, and I expect both projects would be the better for it.