Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a vague feeling he's being snide to pay Elon back for those mildly snarky tweets back when Blue Origin landed their rocket. EDIT: Musk: "Congrats to Jeff Bezos and the BO team for achieving VTOL on their booster" Musk: "It is, however, important to clear up the difference between "space" and "orbit", as described well by https://what-if.xkcd.com/58/" http://money.cnn.com/2015/11/24/news/companies/elon-musk-jef…
-404: https://what-if.xkcd.com/58/
SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
361–370 of 444 posts
Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#362Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#363Earlier quoted context omitted.
You just described the way I launched my first comms network constellation[0] - basically loaded a whole bunch of satellites on a single rocket and deployed them on slightly different orbits, so that they'll spread themselves out as the time goes. Only mid-launch I figured out I could just put three of them on Kerbisynchronous Equatorial Orbit at 120° phase difference :/. Yes, KSP is absolutely amazing for learning t…
is it this one? https://kerbalspaceprogram.com/en/
Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#364In a single moment, SpaceX earns itself more than $50 million dollars, right? That's a big bonus for everyone who made this possible and some well earned time off, and then back to work changing the world! So from what I've read, the returns are immense; the amount of learning they can do from examining their own rocket is the real initial treasure. Their rocket design should advance considerably based on this trove,…
I guess this would be a good place to point out that we are hiring! :-) http://www.spacex.com/careers
Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#365This is so exciting. Not quite a moon landing, but still feels like watching a significant moment in history. Does anyone know what specifically changed to allow a landing attempt on land as opposed to barge? Was it just that they gained enough confidence with the barges that they would at least be able to hit the target (and not crash into a building or something), or was some regulatory clearance received or someth…
I believe the main concern was not putting what amounts to an ICBM into Disneyworld. Hitting the barge (even though they hit a little hard each time) proved they could hit within a few feet of where they planned reliably.
Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#366Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#367Earlier quoted context omitted.
That, and I want to see an Epic Rap Battle of History between Musk and Bezos some day. It will take a lot of competition and a lot of progress before they have enough dirt to throw at each other.
Hahaha... Thanks, that cheered me up. Someone should totally do rap battles while pretending to be some famous figure. The possibilities are endless. Faux Bill Gates vs Faux Steve Jobs.
It's a bit silly, but entertaining. It doesn't get too technical, but usually gets the generic facts right.
Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#368Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not just you. This is my take on it: However nerve-racking the launch and first stage recovery were, this wasn't a sports event, and cannot support that kind of hyper-enthusiastic presentation style without looking staged and histrionic. Sports presentations like that work because there are lots of fans cheering wildly in the background, and sports might be unique in their license to evoke extreme enthusiasm wit…
'presentation style'. Are you suggesting the employee audience reaction was staged and orchestrated, and not just spontaneous?
If I were to make a suggestion, it would be to house the loud employees in a large sound-proof booth, but I suspect that would only lead to yet more downvotes here...
Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#369Earlier quoted context omitted.
Technically they only earn the $50m when they use this stage to actually launch another mission. Even then, you'd have to subtract any discount offered to the purchaser of the second mission. I'm not in any way trying to detract from this stunning, tear-inducingly great achievement, but that's the reality.
Why would they offer a discount? The rocket is not going to fly a second time unless it has the same reliability rating as the first. They might end up offering lower cost launches, reducing the margin, but discounts on Nth-launches don't make sense.
Note: The never before been re-used part is probably the most important factor here. Once they have re-used rockets a few times they'll have a reliability factor for these situations.
Re: SpaceX launch webcast: Orbcomm-2 Mission [video]
#370Earlier quoted context omitted.
OK, explain how the landing of the SpaceX first stage was many times more difficult? They used different mechanisms, yes (suicide burn vs. hover-capable) and the purpose of the overall system was different, but they are both VTOL rockets. Blue Origin was first , and Bezos can quite rightly welcome SpaceX to 'the club' as the second company to achieve this, without being accused of being classless, surely?
Because the Falcon 9 traveled at several thousand miles per hour horizontally when it did its flip and then the first retro burn. By contrast, the Blue Origin rocket went straight up, and straight back down. It never moved away from the launchpad in any appreciable amount and it never had to change orientation. From a space applications perspective it is not much more useful than a blimp. Today, history was made. Blu…