Live data from Hacker News

Obama Signs CISA Bill into Law

npr.org

1–10 of 230 posts

Re: Obama Signs CISA Bill into Law

#4
How this happened [1]:

In a late-night session of Congress, House Speaker Paul Ryan announced a new version of the “omnibus” bill, a massive piece of legislation that deals with much of the federal government’s funding. It now includes a version of CISA as well. Lumping CISA in with the omnibus bill further reduces any chance for debate over its surveillance-friendly provisions, or a White House veto. And the latest version actually chips away even further at the remaining personal information protections that privacy advocates had fought for in the version of the bill that passed the Senate.

Snowden's comment on this:

Shameful: @Facebook secretly backing Senate's zombie #CISA surveillance bill while publicly pretending to oppose it. https://t.co/du7RK7V1WJ — Edward Snowden (@Snowden) October 25, 2015

[1] http://www.wired.com/2015/12/congress-slips-cisa-into-omnibu...

Re: Obama Signs CISA Bill into Law

#5
There have been very many versions of laws similar to CISA that have been proposed, modified, and changed/passed/failed/delayed. When I try to understand exactly what this CISA version includes, most rhetoric I read is alarmist and not conducive to actually knowing what can and cannot be done under CISA.

Is there a digestible explanation of what this CISA entails?

Re: Obama Signs CISA Bill into Law

#10

There have been very many versions of laws similar to CISA that have been proposed, modified, and changed/passed/failed/delayed. When I try to understand exactly what this CISA version includes, most rhetoric I read is alarmist and not conducive to actually knowing what can and cannot be done under CISA. Is there a digestible explanation of what this CISA entails?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersecurity_Information_Shar...

The core problem is it lets major industry players like MS / Google / Apple give the fed access to all the personal info they record without investigators needing a warrant and with no liability on the companies part (ie, you cannot sue them for state disclosure of your personal info that then resulted in harm against you). It basically means do not be surprised when you are charged with crimes for "private" communications over facetime, hangouts, skype, or with email over hotmail / yahoo / gmail.

If you want slightly more editorialized takes on the terms, while the EFF and ACLU are obviously opinionated in this, I've never heard of them lying:

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/06/zombie-bill-comes-back... https://www.aclu.org/blog/beware-dangers-congress-latest-cyb...

Post reply on HN