The Siege of Miami
newyorker.com
The Siege of Miami
1–10 of 24 posts
Re: The Siege of Miami
#2Re: The Siege of Miami
#3Or ... spend hundreds of billions to save a wealthy municipality hundreds of millions?
Re: The Siege of Miami
#4So, basically, we should restructure our entire economy so some multi-millionaire's luxury vehicle and lawn won't flood on an island? Or ... spend hundreds of billions to save a wealthy municipality hundreds of millions?
Re: The Siege of Miami
#5So, basically, we should restructure our entire economy so some multi-millionaire's luxury vehicle and lawn won't flood on an island? Or ... spend hundreds of billions to save a wealthy municipality hundreds of millions?
Re: The Siege of Miami
#6So, basically, we should restructure our entire economy so some multi-millionaire's luxury vehicle and lawn won't flood on an island? Or ... spend hundreds of billions to save a wealthy municipality hundreds of millions?
It's one thing when Miami Beach gets flooded. As you said, it's a small wealthy suburb, and it can afford to protect itself against rising sea levels. On the other hand, the entire country of Bangladesh isn't much farther out of the water than Miami Beach. If you think the instability in Syria is bad now, what will happen when a country with literally ten times as many people becomes uninhabitable?
Re: The Siege of Miami
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's one thing when Miami Beach gets flooded. As you said, it's a small wealthy suburb, and it can afford to protect itself against rising sea levels. On the other hand, the entire country of Bangladesh isn't much farther out of the water than Miami Beach. If you think the instability in Syria is bad now, what will happen when a country with literally ten times as many people becomes uninhabitable?
Syria is bad because of their location, and the interest of major powers. Unfortunately, unless China and/or India take an interest, Bangladesh lacks the money or military power to do anything to disrupt the rest of the World. We can sit back and ignore them dying, and I'm afraid that's what we'll do.
Re: The Siege of Miami
#8Re: The Siege of Miami
#9So, basically, we should restructure our entire economy so some multi-millionaire's luxury vehicle and lawn won't flood on an island? Or ... spend hundreds of billions to save a wealthy municipality hundreds of millions?
The economy will restructure itself and the area will depopulate. The article mentions the role of banks and insurers. Almost nobody can afford to buy a home without a mortgage or to self-insure.
Already, many Florida homeowners have only one option for homeowner's insurance: the Citizens Property Insurance Corporation, which is a non-profit "insurer of last resort". There is no profit in insuring the Florida coasts.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_Property_Insurance_Co...
Re: The Siege of Miami
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's one thing when Miami Beach gets flooded. As you said, it's a small wealthy suburb, and it can afford to protect itself against rising sea levels. On the other hand, the entire country of Bangladesh isn't much farther out of the water than Miami Beach. If you think the instability in Syria is bad now, what will happen when a country with literally ten times as many people becomes uninhabitable?
Syria is bad because of their location, and the interest of major powers. Unfortunately, unless China and/or India take an interest, Bangladesh lacks the money or military power to do anything to disrupt the rest of the World. We can sit back and ignore them dying, and I'm afraid that's what we'll do.