SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
arabcrunch.com
SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
1–10 of 32 posts
Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#2The issue is about principles: freedom to innovate, free access, and to follow open source principles that SF preaches:
The Open Source Definition Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code.
The distribution terms of open-source software must comply with the following criteria: … 5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons. 6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor.
For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.
The blockhead action is a direct Discrimination Against around 200 million innocent people in Syria, Sudan, Iran, N Korea and Cuba.
Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#3Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#4They also potentially cut off the access for people who have their main project site at sf.net - which leaves everyone using the software without updates from a trusted/original source in case of security issues.
Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#5Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#6It’s hard to say SourceForge is in the wrong, given they’re subject to US law. On the other hand, I can’t say they’re in the right, because it does clearly violate the principles of open source/free software. Such situations are unfortunate, but the best solution seems to be ‘hope the law doesn’t come for you’. Not a long-term option.
Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#7It’s hard to say SourceForge is in the wrong, given they’re subject to US law. On the other hand, I can’t say they’re in the right, because it does clearly violate the principles of open source/free software. Such situations are unfortunate, but the best solution seems to be ‘hope the law doesn’t come for you’. Not a long-term option.
You can hardly take GPL source, modify it and refuse to distribute it to certain groups - wether this is your choice or a rule imposed by your country
Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#8Isn't it ironic? They block the page to a specific group of people based on "5. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups". They also potentially cut off the access for people who have their main project site at sf.net - which leaves everyone using the software without updates from a trusted/original source in case of security issues.
Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#9Re: SourceForge Blocks Syria, Sudan, Iran, N. Korea & Cuba
#10It’s hard to say SourceForge is in the wrong, given they’re subject to US law. On the other hand, I can’t say they’re in the right, because it does clearly violate the principles of open source/free software. Such situations are unfortunate, but the best solution seems to be ‘hope the law doesn’t come for you’. Not a long-term option.
You could argue then that they are in breach of the GPL on stuff they do use themselves. You can hardly take GPL source, modify it and refuse to distribute it to certain groups - wether this is your choice or a rule imposed by your country
Quoting from Stallman's The Free Software Definition:
You should also have the freedom to make modifications and use them privately in your own work or play, without even mentioning that they exist. If you do publish your changes, you should not be required to notify anyone in particular, or in any particular way.