> In an age where the state of the art broadband to the home in the U.S.A. is 10 gigabits, Australia is currently building (it claims) a National Broadband Network at great expense that promises a blistering 12 to 100 megabits per second at the top end I know it mentioned "state of the art", but the vast majority of Americans would be lucky to get 100 megabits without breaking the bank every month. Many (most?) don't…
The point in the blog post is that if you are currently building a national broadband network, why would you build anything except state of the art?
I like to play "stupid or liar" when it comes to things like this, but I can't figure out which it is when it comes to the NBN decision making.