Live data from Hacker News

US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

jamesfallows.theatlantic.com

21–30 of 35 posts

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#21

The state of Willamette would be the place to live. Nice weather, mountains, desert, ocean ... Linus.

I don't like crowded places. So when I go visit the U.S.A, the best places to stay for me are the Great Basin, High Plains, and Rocky Mountain High.

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#22
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For some reason I find it hilarious that on the new map Staten Island is part of Jersey..

As a Brooklynite, the idea of being affiliated with Long Island rather than Manhattan fills me with horror.

On the other hand, as a resident of Michigan, there are no words, in any language on Earth, that could begin to capture the joy I feel at the idea of excising Detroit (though I fear it may have already metastasized).

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#23
post #17

It looks like Washington State and Alaska are merged. That makes little sense politically or organizationally. Where's Hawaii fit into this? Assuming 50 reapportioned states that's 6 million per state, and Hawaii only has 1.3 million people. Rio Grande State should go north with the Rio Grande and not include Arizona. That is, it should be El Paso/Las Cruces/Albuquerque/Santa Fe and up into southern Colorado. As it i…

Hawaii is problematic, being a significant fraction of the target population level, yet very isolated. Alaska doesn't really make sense to combine with anything either, but its population is pretty much rounding error (it's got, what, as many people as maybe three blocks of Manhattan?) so it probably wouldn't matter that much.

Though maybe it'd make more sense to just grant Hawaii independence and sell Alaska back to the Russians or something--the whole noncontiguous territory never sat well with me anyway.

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#24
post #5

My only complaint is that they still left the UP as part of Michigan... it would look much cleaner to throw that into another piece. If you ever wondered why it became part of Michigan read up on the "War of Toledo" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toledo_War

My impression (from talking to yooper coworkers) is that it's about half Wisconsin, half Canada up there. Either way, doesn't make sense to lump them in with us trolls.

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a Brooklynite, the idea of being affiliated with Long Island rather than Manhattan fills me with horror.

On the other hand, as a resident of Michigan, there are no words, in any language on Earth, that could begin to capture the joy I feel at the idea of excising Detroit (though I fear it may have already metastasized).

This data is already 10 years old. That means Detroit has already started shrinking, and therefore the new Detroit, if kept as an independent city, would be consuming more of Michigan.

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#26
post #17

It looks like Washington State and Alaska are merged. That makes little sense politically or organizationally. Where's Hawaii fit into this? Assuming 50 reapportioned states that's 6 million per state, and Hawaii only has 1.3 million people. Rio Grande State should go north with the Rio Grande and not include Arizona. That is, it should be El Paso/Las Cruces/Albuquerque/Santa Fe and up into southern Colorado. As it i…

"Alaska and Hawaii become part of the states of Washlaska and Coronado, respectively."

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#27
post #5

My only complaint is that they still left the UP as part of Michigan... it would look much cleaner to throw that into another piece. If you ever wondered why it became part of Michigan read up on the "War of Toledo" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toledo_War

Having Chesapeake split by Baltimore-Washington is unfortunate too.

Well, the alternative view is that it's split by the Chesapeake Bay. It's a bit tough to tell whether it got Annapolis and the Bay Bridge, though.

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#28
post #21

The state of Willamette would be the place to live. Nice weather, mountains, desert, ocean ... Linus.

I don't like crowded places. So when I go visit the U.S.A, the best places to stay for me are the Great Basin, High Plains, and Rocky Mountain High.

Most of Willamette is not very dense.

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#29
post #17

It looks like Washington State and Alaska are merged. That makes little sense politically or organizationally. Where's Hawaii fit into this? Assuming 50 reapportioned states that's 6 million per state, and Hawaii only has 1.3 million people. Rio Grande State should go north with the Rio Grande and not include Arizona. That is, it should be El Paso/Las Cruces/Albuquerque/Santa Fe and up into southern Colorado. As it i…

Hawaii is problematic, being a significant fraction of the target population level, yet very isolated. Alaska doesn't really make sense to combine with anything either, but its population is pretty much rounding error (it's got, what, as many people as maybe three blocks of Manhattan?) so it probably wouldn't matter that much. Though maybe it'd make more sense to just grant Hawaii independence and sell Alaska back to…

Wouldn't it make more sense to sell it to the Canadians if contiguous territory was a big issue?

Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hawaii is problematic, being a significant fraction of the target population level, yet very isolated. Alaska doesn't really make sense to combine with anything either, but its population is pretty much rounding error (it's got, what, as many people as maybe three blocks of Manhattan?) so it probably wouldn't matter that much. Though maybe it'd make more sense to just grant Hawaii independence and sell Alaska back to…

Wouldn't it make more sense to sell it to the Canadians if contiguous territory was a big issue?

Only with vacant possession - you aren't getting rid of Palin that easily
Post reply on HN