US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
jamesfallows.theatlantic.com
US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
1–10 of 35 posts
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#2(Attribution: I found it on Fallows's blog: http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2010/01/thought...)
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#3(Attribution: I found it on Fallows's blog: http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2010/01/thought... )
s/states/cities/
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#4(Attribution: I found it on Fallows's blog: http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2010/01/thought... )
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#5My only complaint is that they still left the UP as part of Michigan... it would look much cleaner to throw that into another piece. If you ever wondered why it became part of Michigan read up on the "War of Toledo" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toledo_War
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#6My only complaint is that they still left the UP as part of Michigan... it would look much cleaner to throw that into another piece. If you ever wondered why it became part of Michigan read up on the "War of Toledo" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toledo_War
Having Chesapeake split by Baltimore-Washington is unfortunate too.
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#7Can anyone tell how he did this? Was it through trial/error?
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#8Interesting to see that Missouri hardly changes at all.
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#9Can anyone tell how he did this? Was it through trial/error?
Probably looking at county populations
Re: US states redrawn so as to have equal populations
#10Only change I would make: Include Santa Cruz in SF Bay state