Not to say that the system is working correctly, but from a quick glance to the comment section of the article, I'm not really sure if either of these is the real deal breaker. If it actually is him responding in the comments, he seems incapable of writing basic sentences. He also plays the race card several times in his commentary. For someone struggling to get a job, I find it utterly mind-boggling he would attach his name to comments like:
> ,,And ME thinks ,,,That maybe YOU should THINK !!! LOLOL
> Again ,,,Your Kind ,,convict MY kind ,,,ALL the time !!!!!
> You probably have a hard time accepting anything from a Black Person
There are countless more. From my perspective, most (definitely not all) are in response to non-inflammatory commentary. If I were HR and a basic google search turned this up, I wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole, let alone even bother with an actual background check. I use full sentences and am reasonably respectful with my username as "lloyd-christmas". If I used my real name, I'd likely be even more PC/respectful/cautious.
For someone that has first hand experience in regards to the impact of background checks, he's sure not making it any easier on himself.