Earlier quoted context omitted.
First, Not many people buy expensive mechanical watches. If they do, they already know that the time may be inaccurate sometimes. Second, Macbook Pro is not a great example since its primary purpose is not displaying time.
Similarly, I don't think the primary purpose/raison d'etre of the Apple Watch is to tell time. It certainly isn't what you're paying $300+ for.
Half a year later, the Apple Watch feels like a stalled platform
101–107 of 107 posts
Re: Half a year later, the Apple Watch feels like a stalled platform
#102They need to get the battery life above "1 day". I think that's what's stopping MANY people. In my case, I almost need sleep tracking (diagnosed with a sleep disorder).
I think this is a great future market. It's quite unfortunate that, although the Apple watch has a pulse oximeter in it, the functionality is currently disabled. Reportedly because it would then be a medical device in the eyes of the FDA.
Good sleep tracking, just that one function, could conceivably sell millions of units.
Re: Half a year later, the Apple Watch feels like a stalled platform
#103When the iPhone was about this mature, it didn't even have native apps yet. One presumes that the watch will become substantially more powerful and better utilised over time too.
Does anyone else not remember this?!
From comments online, I find it really hard to believe that the world has collectively forgotten that. Did I live in a bubble, or is everyone else's memory of 2007 just way off? From what I remembered, it was outright mass hysteria.
The watch, OTOH, just doesn't excite people the same way. Critics and skeptics have not been silenced. It doesn't even excite their owners the same way. People are buying and returning the watches. Owners are defensive when talking about the watch, instead of the cult-like adoration and mass hysteria that followed the original iPhone.
Re: Half a year later, the Apple Watch feels like a stalled platform
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's notable if its main competitor in the market (allegedly) doesn't.
What main competitor is not keeping time correctly? The main competitor for any smart watch is the regular watch. Specifically for the Apple Watch it is one of the many smart watches running Android Wear or the Pebble. I have never heard or seen anything to indicate these watches have a problem with keeping time. Now that I think about it, I don't think I have ever seen anything about Apple Watch having problems keep…
If the allegation were true, though, it'd be a notable issue/feature in a comparison versus Apple Watch.
Re: Half a year later, the Apple Watch feels like a stalled platform
#105They need to get the battery life above "1 day". I think that's what's stopping MANY people. In my case, I almost need sleep tracking (diagnosed with a sleep disorder).
diagnosed with a sleep disorder I think this is a great future market. It's quite unfortunate that, although the Apple watch has a pulse oximeter in it, the functionality is currently disabled. Reportedly because it would then be a medical device in the eyes of the FDA. Good sleep tracking, just that one function, could conceivably sell millions of units.
Re: Half a year later, the Apple Watch feels like a stalled platform
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
I can already do that with the Pebble as long as I've got headphones on. I wouldn't mind the addition of a microphone for voice input (the new Pebble Time has this), but I definitely don't want a speakerphone on my watch.
I thought that only worked if you have your phone in your pocket?
Re: Half a year later, the Apple Watch feels like a stalled platform
#107I find it ironic that the iPhone itself probably got a significant number of people out of the habit of wearing watches. Once my phone could tell me what time it was, that was the end of my watch-wearing days. Though, I never really liked them anyway.