Just take this test: Try to download the Filezilla and when the download page shows click on the Direct Link. Then compare the two executables, one that downloaded automatically and the one that it downloaded via the direct link. You will see that the direct download is clean but the other has the SF icon and it has a virus!
Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
101–110 of 217 posts
Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#102No way I'm supporting this kind of behavior. Can you suggest an alternative to FileZilla ?
I use WinSCP. I cannot say much about technical differences, but it has worked well for me. Also, PuTTY comes with a SFTP/SCP client, and unless there are strong reasons you cannot use SFTP, it is a lot better than FTP, security-wise (does not transmit passwords in plain text and allows using cryptographic keys rather than passwords; in fact, on OpenSSH you can configure the server to deny password authentication com…
Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#103No way I'm supporting this kind of behavior. Can you suggest an alternative to FileZilla ?
you can install Filezilla from Ninite. https://ninite.com/ Well - you are trusting that Ninite doesn't include any crapware / malware, but until now I didn't had any problems with it. Makes updating Java Runtime much nicer too.
Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Shouldn't this be a criminal offense?
It's usually hidden in the EULA. Very hidden. It's not just Filezilla or sourceforge doing this. Lenovo do this routinely. They used to bundle something called BrowserGuard, which contains a PUP by Conduit. Conduit have since been partially acquired by another company Perion. I followed that rabbit hole last year, Lenovo point blank refuse to acknowledge it is spyware. And it IS spyware. I created a Perion account to…
Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem is not FileZilla, but SourceForge. They do this to all their files.
I had contacted FileZilla's developer about this back in 2014. He let me know that bundling crapware was "intentional" http://i.imgur.com/AvfDuOA.png His statement about alternate download links was also incorrect, because I was asking about Filezilla server, which I could not find anywhere but sourceforge.
Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#106Earlier quoted context omitted.
Someone explained that after he got some malware on his computer and subsequently all his websites were hacked. The response? Once you've got malware on your computer, you've lost already, game over. You need to prevent the infection in the first place. OMFG...
That's correct though. Even if the passwords weren't stored at all, malware could just install a keylogger and record them when you typed them in.
Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#107Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
If the server checked against a client-provided hash, the hash would become the password , and the attacker could just use the hash as-is to login to the server. Hashing on the client solves nothing.
Except if you require hash of (password+timestamp modulo 60000)
Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#109Something came up last time Sourceforge was discussed here, namely "why are projects still using it?"... I'm the project lead for LXQt ( http://lxqt.org ). We inherited some infrastructure legacy from LXDE, which was hosted on sourceforge. Today, we have moved most of the legacy to Github but we're still using Sourceforge's mailing list system. We're moving to a self-hosted mailman3 instance but it's been excruciatin…
D has the best mailing list interface in the world by an enormous margin . http://forum.dlang.org/ (The forum is a front-end to the mailing lists / newsgroups.)
Re: Trojan found in Filezilla downloaded from SourceForge
#110AFAIK this practice (and not on the FileZilla project alone) is why uBlock Origin is blocking SourceForge.
Though ublock origin can use it, it's the ublock badware risks filter list which is blocking sourceforge : https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Badware-risks