> We already know that today’s energy sources cannot sustain a future we want to live in. Is this really true? In Lazard's 2014 comparison of total cost per MWh, both wind and solar beat coal and nuclear [1]. Costs have fallen so much that it's becoming hard to justify continued subsidies [2]. [1] http://energyinnovation.org/2015/02/07/levelized-cost-of-ene... [2] http://www.treehugger.com/renewable-energy/us-energy-…
Lazard link: https://www.lazard.com/media/1777/levelized_cost_of_energy_-... They have a tendency to break links, so a community-oriented individual might feel inclined to save/cache the link ;)
looks like someone already did:
http://wayback.archive.org/web/20151117024445/https://www.la...