11–20 of 85 posts
Why am I not surprised that it is using both WebForms and Silverlight... I see that big chunk of viewstate there Bill.
and this is also kind of funny: ...
This is doing the rounds on the net too: http://www.thegatesnotes.com/robots.txt It doesn't mention Bing. Amusing, and useless.
This is doing the rounds on the net too: http://www.thegatesnotes.com/robots.txt It doesn't mention Bing. Amusing, and useless.
Why is it useless (I've never worked with robots.txt)? Are the /css and /js files not large enough to bother skipping?
Blocking /css and /js makes sense because they don't add value in being crawled. Not necessary, but doesn't hurt.
Best practice: Always have a robots.txt file, even if it's empty.
This is doing the rounds on the net too: http://www.thegatesnotes.com/robots.txt It doesn't mention Bing. Amusing, and useless.
Why is it useless (I've never worked with robots.txt)? Are the /css and /js files not large enough to bother skipping?
# robots.txt # # This file is to prevent the crawling and indexing of certain parts # of your site by web crawlers and spiders run by sites like Yahoo! # and Google. By telling these "robots" where not to go on your site, # you save bandwidth and server resources.
Such a childish signature.
Why am I not surprised that it is using both WebForms and Silverlight... I see that big chunk of viewstate there Bill.
Wouldn't that be ironic - If a large number of visitors were using Firefox, Safari & Chrome?