Lists
avc.com
Lists
1–10 of 106 posts
Re: Lists
#2GitHub turned out to be a pretty decent place for collaborating on various lists.
I mean, the list of awesome lists[0] is currently the 23rd most starred GitHub project.
I'm using GitHub both as a collaborative tool for creating lists and as my own tool for creating lists (as an example, a list of books I have read / am reading / planning on reading [1]).
[0] https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome
[1] https://github.com/aleksandar-todorovic/notes/blob/master/00...
Re: Lists
#3I don't understand this post at all. The reason no one has built a monopoly around lists is that they are a ridiculously cheap commodity, both for the personal and network use cases.
Re: Lists
#4I think the reason no one has nailed the distributed list making part is because that's basically email, which it's really hard to improve substantially on, it turns out.
Re: Lists
#5I don't understand this post at all. The reason no one has built a monopoly around lists is that they are a ridiculously cheap commodity, both for the personal and network use cases.
Read like an Onion article to me.
Re: Lists
#6[deleted]
Re: Lists
#7[deleted]
Re: Lists
#8Odd: Pinterest seems to me like the breakout published list platform. No one said lists have to be words only: a Pinterest board is just a list with pictures.
Re: Lists
#9The List App https://li.st/ is currently getting some traction by being promoted by a bunch of Hollywood people, notably the founder(?) B.J. Novak.
Re: Lists
#10Simple, general-purpose personal publishing is not really a part of the modern web in any straightforward way. There are plenty of special-purpose 'listmaking' services — but it's hard to imagine one tackling the problem in the general case because it's just not a great business. Email gets shoehorned into this usecase because it's one of the only personal publishing tool that's totally decentralized and really easy to use.
[edit: grammar]