Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
1–10 of 70 posts
Re: Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
#2Re: Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
#3Re: Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
#4Soon in the news: Comcast sues to make going to the bathroom during commercial breaks illegal.
Formulated like that, it even sounds like a feature ;).
Re: Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
#5So, they've already lost in the German courts vs. ABP; why do they get to keep going after other companies with the same bogus arguments?
Re: Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
#6Re: Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
#7So, they've already lost in the German courts vs. ABP; why do they get to keep going after other companies with the same bogus arguments?
Re: Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
#8They somehow managed to get a law in place which prohibits quoting of even small passages online (i.e. Google News) without paying for it. What did Google do? Simply removed them from the results, they tried to sue and lost. Now they gave Google permission to include them for free. What about the smaller services? Who cares about those - loads of news aggregators shut down in response.
Now that (some) adblockers have been ruled legal they sued a bunch of people (youtuber, the adblock forum) for providing instruction on how to get around the anti-adblocker wall they put in Fun times
Re: Axel Springer Goes After iOS 9 Ad Blockers in New Legal Battle
#9Then trying to shut down ad blockers by legal routes must be completely pointless if just asking people is so effective?