Live data from Hacker News

Does DST Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana (2008)

nber.org

1–8 of 8 posts

Re: Does DST Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana (2008)

#4
post #3

Sold. So next summer we just ignore the switch to DST? Or next fall we ignore the switch back to standard time?

Let's stay on DST instead of rolling the clocks back. It was pitch black outside by 4:30 today, and there's another four weeks to go until the solstice. I like to have some chance of seeing the sun in the winter.

Re: Does DST Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana (2008)

#5
post #4
post #3

Sold. So next summer we just ignore the switch to DST? Or next fall we ignore the switch back to standard time?

Let's stay on DST instead of rolling the clocks back. It was pitch black outside by 4:30 today, and there's another four weeks to go until the solstice. I like to have some chance of seeing the sun in the winter.

I completely agree. I'd rather spring forward two hours myself – then I could wake up at the crack of dawn at 10am.

Re: Does DST Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana (2008)

#6
post #4
post #3

Sold. So next summer we just ignore the switch to DST? Or next fall we ignore the switch back to standard time?

Let's stay on DST instead of rolling the clocks back. It was pitch black outside by 4:30 today, and there's another four weeks to go until the solstice. I like to have some chance of seeing the sun in the winter.

Why? Just drop DST and adjust the schedules.

Re: Does DST Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana (2008)

#7
post #3

Sold. So next summer we just ignore the switch to DST? Or next fall we ignore the switch back to standard time?

I say we stay on DST, then apply DST again and stay on it, then apply DST again and stay on the result, and so on.

Think of all the energy we'll save!