If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
1–10 of 25 posts
Re: If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
#2Articles lacking a last-modified date are annoying as well—'About' pages are a classic case in point.
Re: If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
#3If you don't date at work, it also sucks (romance, not time)
:D In all seriousness, people spend a ridiculous % of their lives at work, sometimes it happens, and sometimes it works out!
Re: If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
#4On a related note update the copyright date on your websites to 2010! I updated ours at JTV on Friday, Youtube is so 2009 :-)
Re: If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
#5I feel the same way as the auther. It drives me nuts when I'm reading something and I don't know the time context it was written in.
Re: If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
#6Now I want to display a random date to each viewer of my blog, and record that date when they make a comment. Then I will see if the commentary changes based on the date they think the article was published. (The dates on the comments will also be changed randomly.)
Re: If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
#7I completely agree and I can't help but think that it relates to "The Last Responsible Moment" approach to decision making where delay = more current data, so if an article has no date, its value is seriously suspect.
Re: If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
#8Same thing applies to tutorials which don't mention version numbers and such...
Re: If You Don't Date Your Work It Sucks (date as in time, not as in romance)
#9On a related note update the copyright date on your websites to 2010! I updated ours at JTV on Friday, Youtube is so 2009 :-)
Just make it automatic.