31–40 of 76 posts
Alternatively, the discussion below seems to point out that screenshot blocking is ineffective. If all devices are in the same room, a swift punch to the mouth and taking someone else's device could remove that possibility.
It cuts both ways.
Anyone else wondering why you don't just physically show ppl the pictures if you are in the same location as them?
The idea is that you can only access the pictures if everyone of the group is physically present. Sort of how multiple people need to turn a key at the same time to launch a nuclear missile.
Everyone has to be in the same place? I can just hand my phone to someone else and let them see something, no data exchange or app required. Alternatively, the discussion below seems to point out that screenshot blocking is ineffective. If all devices are in the same room, a swift punch to the mouth and taking someone else's device could remove that possibility. It cuts both ways.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The idea is that you can only access the pictures if everyone of the group is physically present. Sort of how multiple people need to turn a key at the same time to launch a nuclear missile.
We understand the idea. The only usage we can imagine, sharing a private photo, seems way harder in this app than just passing someone your phone.
Everyone has to be in the same place? I can just hand my phone to someone else and let them see something, no data exchange or app required. Alternatively, the discussion below seems to point out that screenshot blocking is ineffective. If all devices are in the same room, a swift punch to the mouth and taking someone else's device could remove that possibility. It cuts both ways.
This assumes that you are aware that the screenshot was taken.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be clear, the culture that's producing this app is people trying every permutation possible for app ideas, throwing them out with cliche landing pages, and marketing them on channels like this or Reddit or Product Hunt. I think there is a 0% chance that the creator is actually a partier who needed this and so he built it.
The two cultures are terrible.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To be clear, the culture that's producing this app is people trying every permutation possible for app ideas, throwing them out with cliche landing pages, and marketing them on channels like this or Reddit or Product Hunt. I think there is a 0% chance that the creator is actually a partier who needed this and so he built it.
The two cultures are terrible.
Rather than spending 18 months building and 'perfecting' and idea in private then releasing it to real people, doesn't it seem more efficient to Throw 10 ideas/'micro mvps' at the wall and see what sticks? Seems fairly solid to me.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
We understand the idea. The only usage we can imagine, sharing a private photo, seems way harder in this app than just passing someone your phone.
It seems like you don't understand the idea. This ensures that all parties consent to the content being viewed by any other party.
Joe takes a picture. I want to see it. But, oops, Billy isn't here to complete the nuclear launch procedure. So I turn to Joe and say "hey, text me that funny picture of Billy." What happens next?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The two cultures are terrible.
The cultures that try and experiment with different ideas? Rather than spending 18 months building and 'perfecting' and idea in private then releasing it to real people, doesn't it seem more efficient to Throw 10 ideas/'micro mvps' at the wall and see what sticks? Seems fairly solid to me.