Live data from Hacker News

Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

businessinsider.com

111–120 of 125 posts

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#111
I'll be honest that a major reason I stopped watching cable. I use to freak out because of the frequency of ads. Intro to the show? Followed by an ad. I understand the length of ads but constantly interrupting the show is what upset me much more. I'd rather watch 7 minutes of ads at once then 7 1 minute ad segments.

Now I never worry about it because of Netflix. If only I could get rid of Ads for podcasts.

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#112
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

2 points. I won't speak for myself, but from what I've gathered from friends: 1. A lot of people seem to like video ads. Movie ads specially tell you 'whats hot', and general ads put you 'in the loop' so to speak. I've tried to install ABV for a couple of people who won't let me because they actually like ads (as in youtube, not the shiny bright popups). This may be true for more people than HN crowd would assume. 2.…

Number 2 is true and very frustrating. I'd like to have a Netflix channel option. Sci-fi channel, horror channel etc. Did you ever call up someone else and tell them to turn to a channel then share in the same experience?

One issue with this will be that so much media seems to be moving to very compelling stories, and you don't want to miss any. You used to be able to tune into the middle of a show without really missing anything.

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#113

Aside from ads, freedom of choice with respect to just what you watch seem to be the other key motivator. With the capability of streaming and on-demand services, why would any consumer put up with having to choose any channel with a fixed programming schedule? I almost certainly don't want to watch what you're trying to sell. No other industry seems to operate in this manner. When it comes to books, games, music, et…

2 points. I won't speak for myself, but from what I've gathered from friends: 1. A lot of people seem to like video ads. Movie ads specially tell you 'whats hot', and general ads put you 'in the loop' so to speak. I've tried to install ABV for a couple of people who won't let me because they actually like ads (as in youtube, not the shiny bright popups). This may be true for more people than HN crowd would assume. 2.…

#2 is also solved by netflix-roulette on the 'popular' row. It's actually pretty fun!

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#114
As much as I dislike cable due to all the advertising, I eventually signed up because I wanted to catch some NFL games (was just doing streaming Amazon, Netflix, etc for quite a while prior, with no NFL). I initially got an HD antenna, but reception was spotty where I live and some local channels wouldn't even come in. The amount of advertising on cable is really annoying, but it is a shame that it seems somehow very difficult or impossible to actually stream a live NFL game without having a cable or satellite package of some kind. Following online 'gamecasts' that don't actually show the video of the players on the field just isn't the same.

This is frustrating because it seems the NFL and television network providers have effectively made games impossible to watch live unless you go through the 'funnel' they want you to go through to watch it. Due to this, I've felt much less freedom of choice to select from what source I choose to obtain live NFL games, in comparison to movies, TV shows, etc, which I can generally end up finding on a streaming service of some kind to buy from.

A plus that I had forgotten about, is the on-demand stuff with a cable package, which is similar to the other streaming services I'm used to (usually no ads, or maybe one at the start of streaming), except it's nice to not have to pay for a season of a show (like I might on Amazon) if the station the show is on was paid for as part of the cable package.

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#115
I've been off cable (television as a service) for close to two years now. The space where TV exists for value, is our local programming and news. The national relevance is almost moot from a television source, considering I read online news more here and Leister Holtz on NBC. The net savings basically was 1/2 the Time Warner bill -> $105 -> $56. That's almost $2500 in the last two years. That's a refactor of savings into something like a boiler upgrade, or solar panels to portions of the house to extend the savings even further. Either way ... small bill, big savings.

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#116
Second thought is the add revenue in YouTube and how Google is slowly making it impossible to view something without an intro ad to a video spot I want to watch. Sanity on product reviews, or modifications might actually drive me away from YouTube and stick to reading. I use the MVPS.org hosts file to ad-block most of the website content I review, as I pipe it into /etc/hosts and c:\%windows%\system32\drives\etc\hosts files to keep myself from the flash -> ad-virus injection methods for security reasons. However, YT is driving me crazy with 30s ad spots for like a 3 minute video and you can't walk around them no matter how you try unless you browser jack or regional change some things (right?). Anyway .... venting on Google's ad pushes myself.

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#117
post #35
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Same thing with Charter for me. They constantly try to sell me a $7/month addon that will give access to over-the-air channels through cable. I got that with a >$10 HD antenna, so I'm not sure what the value would be. (and I've barely used that...)

I've been trying to (unsuccessfully) research why OTA broadcasts of channels exist in the first place. Why do/would these networks provide their service for free? I thought transmissions were to be encrypted. Am I missing something?

They're still ad supported, and their infrastructure costs are much smaller than cable. (Eg, no plant of copper and fibre run across cities. Just some leased tower space, etc)

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#118

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah... but then you have to live in Albuquerque... I don't know if good TV is worth THAT price. /s But seriously... I don't mind TV on a schedule SOMETIMES (Walking Dead for example was worth catching on Sunday Night... with the following Talking Dead.) But a majority of the time, I'm doing this or that and want to catch something on my on time. I'm not 100% against commercials, personally... but the extreme to whic…

>> But a majority of the time, I'm doing this or that and want to catch something on my on time. That's what a DVR is for. They don't actually make anything off the shelf for OTA in the US, but a bit of software and a DTV peripheral on a computer can provide this. I hear TiVo is still around, but not very popular.

TiVo is still around and handles OTA just fine, as I understand it. (I use mine with cable and never watch anything live.)

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#119
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It changed. There's an ad-free option on Hulu now.

Hulu just started offering an ad-free option recently.

Note the asterisk, though. Apparently a few shows are contractually obligated to include ads on Hulu, even with the "commercial-free" option.

Re: Cable companies have started showing fewer ads because of Netflix

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Except Hulu (at least used to, it may have changed recently) still shows ads to their premium subscribers, which is the dumbest thing I've ever seen.

It changed. There's an ad-free option on Hulu now.

And it is glorious. I love love love it.
Post reply on HN