I notice that they're using a 500GB 5400RPM boot drive. Is there a need for that large of a boot drive? I would have expected that an SSD boot drive would be preferable.
Yev from Backblaze -> We don't need the boot drive to be that "large", but it's more of a pricing thing. An SSD, even at 256GB would be more expensive than those 5400RPM drives, so we just go with what's cheap :)
Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
61–70 of 222 posts
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#62I just posted a link to an interesting blog post detailing the risks of building a storage pod [1] [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10541055
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#63I notice that they're using a 500GB 5400RPM boot drive. Is there a need for that large of a boot drive? I would have expected that an SSD boot drive would be preferable.
Yev from Backblaze -> We don't need the boot drive to be that "large", but it's more of a pricing thing. An SSD, even at 256GB would be more expensive than those 5400RPM drives, so we just go with what's cheap :)
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yev from Backblaze here -> That is boilerplate for the most part, but it's open source, have at it!
Ok I will email my attorney that "Some guy named atYevP on HN told me it was okay." ;)
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#65Worth pointing out (for those of you not in the storage game) that these appliances, while cool, are pretty far from state of the art. We're (Dropbox) packing up to an order of magnitude more storage into 4U. And costs aren't close, let alone the addressable throughput given that you guys just went to 10G. Serious kudos though are due for the Backblaze blog. You're all at least talking about what you're up to, which…
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#66Worth pointing out (for those of you not in the storage game) that these appliances, while cool, are pretty far from state of the art. We're (Dropbox) packing up to an order of magnitude more storage into 4U. And costs aren't close, let alone the addressable throughput given that you guys just went to 10G. Serious kudos though are due for the Backblaze blog. You're all at least talking about what you're up to, which…
I thought Dropbox uses Amazon S3 not their own storage?
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#67Worth pointing out (for those of you not in the storage game) that these appliances, while cool, are pretty far from state of the art. We're (Dropbox) packing up to an order of magnitude more storage into 4U. And costs aren't close, let alone the addressable throughput given that you guys just went to 10G. Serious kudos though are due for the Backblaze blog. You're all at least talking about what you're up to, which…
What order of magnitude? There are 60 drive chassis in 4U you can get[0][1], but even a 4TB -> 6TB drive + 15 more drives isn't exactly an order of magnitude. And they have 2 10GiB ports, though I'm sure you can work with them and get more.. It's disingenuous to call this not "state of the art" when it's really quite close, and obviously is meeting a backblaze design goal. [0]: http://www.newisys.com/Products/4600.sh…
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ok I will email my attorney that "Some guy named atYevP on HN told me it was okay." ;)
Having sold a company to IBM, I can attest that this issue would be a Big Problem. {Edit: I mean for any company that used BlackBlaze diagrams labeled "proprietary."}
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#69Worth pointing out (for those of you not in the storage game) that these appliances, while cool, are pretty far from state of the art. We're (Dropbox) packing up to an order of magnitude more storage into 4U. And costs aren't close, let alone the addressable throughput given that you guys just went to 10G. Serious kudos though are due for the Backblaze blog. You're all at least talking about what you're up to, which…
Re: Backblaze Storage Pod 5.0
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
What order of magnitude? There are 60 drive chassis in 4U you can get[0][1], but even a 4TB -> 6TB drive + 15 more drives isn't exactly an order of magnitude. And they have 2 10GiB ports, though I'm sure you can work with them and get more.. It's disingenuous to call this not "state of the art" when it's really quite close, and obviously is meeting a backblaze design goal. [0]: http://www.newisys.com/Products/4600.sh…
you can fit 72 x 8TB pretty easily into 4u with off-the-shelf hardware. with custom-built 2.5" ssd enclosures you could probably fit more in the same space.