Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: New attempt at mobile markup – keep or bail?

news.ycombinator.com

271–280 of 299 posts

Re: Ask HN: New attempt at mobile markup – keep or bail?

#273
post #265

Please make easy url for mobile users who want the desktop version! Auto-detect without opt-out sucks. I like the desktop version better than the new version (android/chrome). I like the tiny fonts for reading. Hitting tiny UI elements is hard, but zooming in then hitting is easy enough. The new big fonts + huge front page margins means much less content visible.

I totally agree. I'd like to take advantage of the screen's DPI, if possible.

Re: Ask HN: New attempt at mobile markup – keep or bail?

#274
post #265

Please make easy url for mobile users who want the desktop version! Auto-detect without opt-out sucks. I like the desktop version better than the new version (android/chrome). I like the tiny fonts for reading. Hitting tiny UI elements is hard, but zooming in then hitting is easy enough. The new big fonts + huge front page margins means much less content visible.

this++ to opt out of the mobile version. This should always be possible.

Tips for mobile developers:

Don't make it impossible to zoom.

Don't make it hard/impossible to get to the desktop version.

Don't make it hard/impossible to view in landscape (I am amazed at the "rotate your device" popups)

Don't make your popups impossible to dismiss on mobile (can't get to the X due to size/positioning)

Don't download megabytes of javascript to display a small amount of text content.

Do support "reader view" (in mobile Safari) or equivalent, so I can get a view that is simply readable AND accessible. Sorry that this overrides your hard work, but really I just want to be able to read your content. Your ads are fine, if they don't use all my bandwidth.

Re: Ask HN: New attempt at mobile markup – keep or bail?

#275
post #274
post #265

Please make easy url for mobile users who want the desktop version! Auto-detect without opt-out sucks. I like the desktop version better than the new version (android/chrome). I like the tiny fonts for reading. Hitting tiny UI elements is hard, but zooming in then hitting is easy enough. The new big fonts + huge front page margins means much less content visible.

this++ to opt out of the mobile version. This should always be possible. Tips for mobile developers: Don't make it impossible to zoom. Don't make it hard/impossible to get to the desktop version. Don't make it hard/impossible to view in landscape (I am amazed at the "rotate your device" popups) Don't make your popups impossible to dismiss on mobile (can't get to the X due to size/positioning) Don't download megabytes…

This should be a manifesto, a bit like "contrast rebellion"

Re: Ask HN: New attempt at mobile markup – keep or bail?

#276

Next up: Comment thread folding. It's the one feature that keeps me from switching from https://cheeaun.github.io/hackerweb/ on mobile, or uninstalling the Hacker News Enhancement Suite in Chrome.

Agreed. This is the straw that nudged me back to Chrome after experimenting with Firefox for a month or so. I just couldn't bear doing without comment thread folding.

Re: Ask HN: New attempt at mobile markup – keep or bail?

#278

This looks (and more importantly, works) much better than before. For those not on mobile, here is what the new layout looks like on an iPhone 6s on iOS 9.0.1. ==> http://imgur.com/5LgB1xB.jpg Here is what the comment page looks like ==> http://i.imgur.com/ugOASR5.png This is the viewport bug when you try to enter a comment ==> http://i.imgur.com/i0Ekiod.png and http://i.imgur.com/T0NDIFc.png

But why does horizontal mode (my standard casual reading mode) look so blown out? ==> http://imgur.com/5Z6q6wI (iOS 9, iPhone 5, Safari)

I have the same problem in standard vertical mode on Android/Chrome. Please revert!

http://i.imgur.com/83wdzFy.gif

Post reply on HN