Hey, the PHP creator included a selfie! (Full disclosure: I write PHP on a daily basis, and reject the opinion that it should be avoided for various reasons, but I recognise the stereotype (that it's not a very 'good' language) enough to derive humour from it - consider it sort of self-deprecating)
I'm with you there - you can pry PHP out of my cold, dead hands. You just can't beat it IMHO for getting small systems up and running quickly. Lots of available libraries and code, and it's either preinstalled or trivial to install on almost everything these days.
Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
201–210 of 241 posts
Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#202Reminds me how bad anti-aliasing on the fonts was back then.
I spend the bulk of 1993-2003 or so staring at text windows made up almost exclusively of the X11 "9x15" font. It's really not bad at all, and occasionally I still fire up an xterm in that just for kicks.
Note also that a lot of what you're identifying as "antialiasing" is simple pixel size. You could certainly generate a nicely-filtered font with a pixel height on 15 on modern systems, but on most displays it would be unreadably small. Typical programmers are working with fonts with literally twice the resolution these days.
Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#203Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if he realises that browsing over Tor with IceCat will be causing him to have quite a distinct browser fingerprint. He should just use Tor Browser.
He could just be changing his user agent to normalize it.
Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#204You know you've made it when you can casually say “I don’t know how to make a screenshot, because I normally use my computer in text-mode.” Badass Richard.
Maybe that is the one thing EMACS cannot do.. making screenshots ;)
Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#205Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which is funny because the effect was important on a 100MHz Pentium, but pretty much negligible beyond that.
I had a Toshiba Libretto 30 with a 486DX processor at 100MHz that was exactly on the boundary. It could play MP3s, but only with the Fraunhofer codec: WinAMP was not quite fast enough. It was a lovely little machine that I set up to dual-boot Linux. If it had had mobile networking it would have been fantastic.
There were software for Windows that could play MP3s at reduced quality. I don't know if I had any counterpart of that for Linux at the time...
I've then replaced CPU with one of the AMD upgrade processor (perhaps 486DX 100MHz equivalent or better, I don't quite remember the detail as it was a long time ago), and that's when I could start playing MP3s.
Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#206Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#207Richard Stallman is a legend. While most of us blindly agree to terms and conditions for crap proprietary software, he doesn't even need a GUI. He's one of my top inspirations. Edit: grammar
while I applaud him for sticking to his convictions, thats like saying that one should walk everywhere because we didn't used to have cars/don't need them
Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is where I got started using Linux. Oh the memories. I even have some of my (terrible) screenshots on there and had submitted a bunch of news articles and hundreds of comments. Now I don't even remember my username.
Oh the memories of nights spent downloading sources on Dial-Up and nights compiling them on Gentoo. Back then we all had hope for the bright future for Linux on desktop, but it never made it, now we are all on OSX :/
Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
> clean and neat Really? You miss that special "concrete gray and primary blue" feel? I think I used every MS operating system starting with DOS, and I miss exactly none of the "historic" interfaces. To the extent I get annoyed when institutional IT departments force you to use the "classic" theme on modern windows boxes ("It's faster!" - no, it isn't to any human perceptible degree, and I appreciate not having to st…
I still think that Windows NT 4 was the best Windows OS ever. And may be the best GUI ever. I always switch to classic theme, if I have to use Windows. In last versions it's not very classic, though.
Re: Screenshots from developers and Unix people taken in 2002
#210Did people primarily not use terminal multiplexers like GNU Screen back then (or like tmux today)? It seems to be a lot of windows all over the place. Other than that, jumping a little ahead --I remember getting Windows XP in late 2001, early 2002. Everything looked so nice and shiny - it may have been the last time I was so unbelievably impressed with Windows. I'm not sure why I liked it so much - either because the…
I've started using screen again for long-running processes so i can detach and reattach later.