Live data from Hacker News

Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day

giantsofit.org

31–40 of 47 posts

Re: Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day

#31

Good page! But Bill Gates did not develop BASIC or DOS.

Gates (along with Allen) did however implement BASIC on quite a few machines. BASIC is a very simple interpreted language, but it was technically impressive to get it running on certain machines of the day as well as it opening the doors to countless other people to begin their journey programming.

Which is irrelevant because the claim being made is that he created the language.

Re: Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day

#33

"classified"? Why not just use the wikipedia pictures for these people?

The license of some of the Wikipedia pictures are preventing me to use them, sorry.

Kudos to you for paying attention to the licensing instead of just ripping them off.

Re: Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean with "degree of separation". Could you elaborate?

For example, it would be interesting to see if or how Linus Torvalds connected to Charles Babbage via the various relationships through the IT giants. If there are 4(as an example) people between them, their degree of separation is 4. It is similar to the Erdös number.

Yes, but what is their Bacon number?

Re: Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day

#36

Im kind of unsure as to how to interpret this, but there appears to be no particular ordering just an influential cs person posted for each day of the month. Theres definitely pleanty of influencers missing from the current set, McCarthy, Hoare, Dijkstra, to name few. If this were my list, I wouldnt have Lovelace or Gates on it, but most of the others seem warrented enough (in my opinion of course) :)

Just curious but why not Lovelace or gates?

Re: Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day

#37

"classified"? Why not just use the wikipedia pictures for these people?

The license of some of the Wikipedia pictures are preventing me to use them, sorry.

FWIW Bertrand Meyer's picture is licensed CC-BY-SA so you're free to use it as long as you share it with the same license.

Re: Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day

#38
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

on the start page ( http://www.giantsofit.org/ ) you will be redirected to the person of today. i just posted here the first person because the person of today (jack kilby) has no image. or do you mean more something like to have the person show on on her/his birthday or day of death?

I think he means the date is of special interest to that person. ie, birthday, deathday, day they released the first version of programming language x, day they founded company y, day product z sold it's first million copies, etc. Or even keeping it topical such as with a new release of OS X you could have one of the core designers / developers of the first version of MacOS. It would make the list much more interesti…

There's something about "random" order that doesn't sit comfortably with someone like myself. I'd agree that some kind of connection to today's date, e.g. birthday, release date, etc. would be good. Or even something simple like making the entire list alphabetical or chronological (that would of course entail preparing the entire list in advance, but if you still want to take suggestions then those suggestions could be for next year's list).

Re: Giants of IT. The giants on whose shoulders we stand. One each day

#40

Im kind of unsure as to how to interpret this, but there appears to be no particular ordering just an influential cs person posted for each day of the month. Theres definitely pleanty of influencers missing from the current set, McCarthy, Hoare, Dijkstra, to name few. If this were my list, I wouldnt have Lovelace or Gates on it, but most of the others seem warrented enough (in my opinion of course) :)

Just curious but why not Lovelace or gates?

Well, Lovelace disputedly created the first program for the Babbage machine under Babbage's guidance. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ada_Lovelace#Controversy_over_...). Although, more difficult perhaps than morse code I wouldnt consider the first person to send morse code a "Giant" by merit of that act alone... And Gates well, thats too long of a story, but for me it boils down to the fact that I dont think he created outstanding products and he didnt contribute to theoretical CS or EE in any direct way. About the only case you can make for him is as an entrepreneur or visionary, for which I personally think there are other candidates that have better arguments for that position.
Post reply on HN