It's the end of man, obviously http://imgur.com/deahE27
Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
141–150 of 195 posts
Re: Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
#142Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It feels slightly unsafe though, just a bit. To me, this is part of the appeal. Abled folks get to do all sorts of slightly unsafe things: skateboarding, motorcycling, etc. Why should disabled folks be tied to ultra-regulated, super-safe electric wheelchairs with absurdly slow governors? The edgy vibe is what makes this cool (for me). I'm allowed to choose to ride a motorcycle (which could leave me stranded / kill…
Uh, because you don't have legs in case of a bad thing, and even though disabled people may have strong arms after using wheelchairs, and a strong spirit, it's still far more risky for them. What if the person break a wrist or an arm and can't move with the remaining one ?
Re: Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
#143Maybe they'll exist by the time I need one.
Re: Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
#144[deleted]
The same way one can walk, or run, the person using the device can adjust his or her speed to their conditioning. I don't really understand the dismissal of the idea because one could go fast with it.
Joystick controlled chairs I've seen have had the joysticks as dead-man's handles too.
I suspect that would lead to some reluctance to embrace the idea completely.
From the perspective of disabilities the demonstrator is certainly using their legs a lot, it seems the usefulness would be for lower limb amputees primarily?
Re: Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it's not (legally) a wheelchair, it doesn't need FDA approval, and from what I understand FDA approval is an extremely expensive process (as in, "increase unit price by hundreds of thousands of dollars" expensive).
So in the end this is a good move? People who need wheelchairs can get them for cheaper, like how gluten-intolerant people get a lot more choices now that gluten-free options are getting so popular
Re: Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
#146Earlier quoted context omitted.
Uh, because you don't have legs in case of a bad thing, and even though disabled people may have strong arms after using wheelchairs, and a strong spirit, it's still far more risky for them. What if the person break a wrist or an arm and can't move with the remaining one ?
That's why it's called risk. An able-bodied person can injure themselves by taking risks just the same. Why should disabled persons be subject to limitations decided by someone else that are designed for the lowest common denominator? That's the only question being brought up here.
Re: Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
#147Is "personal transportation" a new euphemism for "wheelchair"? I've never heard that before.
One thing here is speed.
UK Highway Code says "Powered wheelchairs and scooters MUST NOT travel faster than 4 mph (6 km/h) on pavements or in pedestrian areas." [https://www.gov.uk/guidance/the-highway-code/rules-for-users... - "must not" IIRC means it's illegal with reference to UK legislation].
Re: Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
#148Earlier quoted context omitted.
Segways are cool. Don't have one but I got a chance to test it once. I can see how they could be useful for things like malls and factory floors, in a similar way a kick scooter is. But you know what? Kick scooter is even cooler! The speeds you can achieve on a good concrete surface are exhilarating!
From the outside, powered monowheel seem cooler and less obnoxious than segways. The speed of some of them seems utterly ridiculous though (some brands/models are quoted at 20mph)
Re: Ogo, a new take on personal transportation
#149Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does avoid bearing the medical equipment tag, the old tech metal cruft, disabled .. none of that comes to mind when I saw the video. It might help everybody forget about the condition and start acting normal again. It feels slightly unsafe though, just a bit.
> "It does avoid bearing the medical equipment tag" In my mind, that's a huge negative, because it makes it a lot harder to get insurance to even partially cover the cost.