What do you have to lose?
1) You didn't get the job. 2) They forgot and are glad to fix it. 3) They forgot and are too embarrassed to fix it. You avoid working with tacky people.
21–30 of 46 posts
What do you have to lose?
1) You didn't get the job. 2) They forgot and are glad to fix it. 3) They forgot and are too embarrassed to fix it. You avoid working with tacky people.
Maybe the HR got laid-off?
Maybe the 3 people who interviewed you are from multiple teams within the organisation and they are now fighting over which team gets to hire you?
Its good that you did NOT name names. So in case this turns out to be a long list of co-incidences that lined-up to create this weird "no-response" situation, you are still on track to get hired and work in a job that you find fulfilling.
> Company X is a very well known company that makes GPUs
If Company X is a 3 letter acronym, their recent quarterly finances might have prompted them to re-evaluate all their future hires.
Well, there are lots to hiring someone other than just the technical skills of a candidate. The technical interviewer, sometimes misses a lot on the human element part of it which the HR are more apt in pointing out pretty quickly and accurately. It has been a year every since I joined a friend's company which was acquired by Razorfish sometime back. I've been building and training a creative design and development (…
> HR team rejected them and some of the interesting reasons I found were -- they won't fit in a team setting, they are likely to change really soon and won't stick, and other reasons which I totally overlooked. We don't know if HR was right or just guessing. Maybe you hadn't missed anything and those people would have been great hires?
It is way harder to fire once hired, than spending a bit more time and hire someone else.
Phone screen people are just checking if you are worth bringing for on-site. They cannot possibly make a "hire" decision as their output is either "no" or "maybe". So, most likely, you had been rejected either by one of the screeners or for some random reason. But it won't hurt asking somebody higher up if you really want to work there.
So, yeah, tech interviews and the HR are two separate cans of worms, especially in larger companies. I wouldn't bother with reaching out to the HR, you are clearly not a priority to them. Your best bet would probably be to try and speak with your tech interviewers. However, I think they aren't interested in your either, because otherwise they would've pushed the hiring through the HR and/or contacted you directly already.
First of all i must applaud you on your level-headedness and self-restraint. It is so common to see people exaggerate and rant on public forums / blogs when confronted with such frustrating situations. Maybe the HR got laid-off? Maybe the 3 people who interviewed you are from multiple teams within the organisation and they are now fighting over which team gets to hire you? Its good that you did NOT name names. So in…
This is not a unique situation. Many things could have happened. There could have been a better candidate that popped up. There could no longer be no longer a budget for the job or the team decided to make a change that made this hire no longer needed. People that interviewed you could have left the company. A more senior person could have felt threatened by you and actually wanted someone less talented. Those are th…
That is understandable, but after making me go through 3 technical interviews they could at least have contacted me to let me know they are not interested in hiring me, especially after I contacted her later on.
I've had a similar experience with a company I tried to go back to after leaving a few years prior. I had a couple of interviews, it was great, other people at the company were reaching out to welcome me back, etc. but after my interview nothing happened.
It is frustrating, but if it's really been 3 months since your interview, and you're not getting a response from HR anymore, then you're probably not getting the position. You should move on.