Live data from Hacker News

Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

washingtonpost.com

71–80 of 197 posts

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#71
post #33

You know what. Those parents got those kids into Stanford. Obviously helicopter parenting is working for them. 90% of the decisions people make are based on the environments they are in. Today's environment is extremely competitive and the margin for error is lower. Nobody wants to be the parent of the most mentally stable Starbucks Barista... Get them into Stanford, then they have the rest of their life to "fail"

Exactly so. Only a name-brand school will actually deliver career benefits commensurate with the cost of attending. If you can't get in to a Harvard or Stanford, one might do better to learn a technical trade independently than go into debt to attend a UCSD, Washington State, or god forbid a second-tier private college. Second tier schools are not worth the money they're asking in the present environment.

This is such bullshit. Smart, motivated kids will excel no matter where they are, and there's almost* nothing a Tier 1 state school won't be able to provide that will make a substantive difference in their career. Even Tier 2 public schools will be a-ok, and a lot of those kids will receive large scholarships at tier 2 privates... and they'll end up just fine, also. I think I'd separate your statement into two parts: 1) if you can't get into a decent school, consider trades. 2) god forbid anyone pay list price for a private college education. You & I apparently just disagree on the definition of "decent".

* In all honesty, the only thing I can think of OTOH is if you want to go directly from undergrad into investment banking or elite law, where the vast majority of new hires still come from Ivy League (plus a few others: Duke, Georgetown, Stanford, ...) pipelines.

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#72

You know what. Those parents got those kids into Stanford. Obviously helicopter parenting is working for them. 90% of the decisions people make are based on the environments they are in. Today's environment is extremely competitive and the margin for error is lower. Nobody wants to be the parent of the most mentally stable Starbucks Barista... Get them into Stanford, then they have the rest of their life to "fail"

> Those parents got those kids into Stanford. Correlation/causation fail. The worst part of parents functioning this way is that they assume they are dictating results.

[deleted]

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#73
post #43
post #13

The idea that "today's youth" are more fragile than the youth of yore seems to be a growing meme. I do believe that there is a rise in mental health issues among young adults, but there are many potentially interacting causes. I haven't read the book in question, but I hope that anyone who tackles this subject addresses all the possibly relevant social phenomena before pinning it all on one root cause. Some things I…

> The tightening economic climate and increasing difficulty of staying in the middle class... > But now a majority of people of all socioeconomic brackets yearn for a middle-class existence... There is no middle class. This framing is itself toxic. There are only people who have to work for a living (i.e. the working class), and people for whom paid labor is optional due to accumulated capital of various forms (for s…

This is a great comment, and succinctly states a point I've been trying to make for a long time. You either have to work for a living or you don't.

The term "middle class" simply means you're N+M paychecks away from ruin rather than N paychecks away from ruin. When we say the middle class is disappearing, what we really mean is the percentage of working class people with a savings cushion is disappearing.

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#74

You know what. Those parents got those kids into Stanford. Obviously helicopter parenting is working for them. 90% of the decisions people make are based on the environments they are in. Today's environment is extremely competitive and the margin for error is lower. Nobody wants to be the parent of the most mentally stable Starbucks Barista... Get them into Stanford, then they have the rest of their life to "fail"

I am so grateful to my parents for putting so much trust in me while I was seemingly going out of control during my teenage years.

Seriously, it took me years but I now realize how much self-control and discipline it took them to stick to their philosophy and let me explore things on my own.

I come from a very middle class background, but I had the chance to experience a lot of things. Some I regret, some I don't. But the important is that I know how it feels, and I know what I don't to be. That's also the very way I found my calling in Computer science, and what drives in life.

They have trust me, when empirical evidence was screaming them not to. That's, I believe, the most beautiful proof of love they have ever gave me.

When my turns come, I hope I will be as good as a parent, as they were to me.

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#75

You know what. Those parents got those kids into Stanford. Obviously helicopter parenting is working for them. 90% of the decisions people make are based on the environments they are in. Today's environment is extremely competitive and the margin for error is lower. Nobody wants to be the parent of the most mentally stable Starbucks Barista... Get them into Stanford, then they have the rest of their life to "fail"

What a false dichotomy: Stanford or life as a service worker. Both Google and YC have stopped focusing on college prestige in their hiring/acceptance, because it wasn't a particularly strong indicator of success. I would much rather send healthy kids to a state school or liberal arts college than unhealthy kids to Stanford.

Better to be a Harvard dropout (Zuckerberg) than have a CS degree from Humboldt State.

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#76

Classic PR.

PR for what/who?

"Lythcott-Haims argues in her book “How to Raise an Adult: Break Free of the Overparenting Trap and Prepare Your Kid for Success.”"

Here are some similar articles in suitably similar publications:

http://time.com/3910020/the-over-parenting-trap-how-to-avoid...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julie-lythcotthaims/helicopter...

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/21/books/review/how-to-raise-...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/books/ct-prj-how-to...

It reads like PR, focusing on one author and their opinion (expressed in a recently released book) rather than a spectrum of writers / researchers. This is unfortunate given the historical references to 'helicopter parenting' and other writing that has covered the issue.

I'm not saying it wasn't an informative and interesting read, on the contrary, it was. I was merely pointing out the PR nature of the article.

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What a false dichotomy: Stanford or life as a service worker. Both Google and YC have stopped focusing on college prestige in their hiring/acceptance, because it wasn't a particularly strong indicator of success. I would much rather send healthy kids to a state school or liberal arts college than unhealthy kids to Stanford.

Better to be a Harvard dropout (Zuckerberg) than have a CS degree from Humboldt State.

And to combine that with an upper middle class background (like Zuckerberg)

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#78

You know what. Those parents got those kids into Stanford. Obviously helicopter parenting is working for them. 90% of the decisions people make are based on the environments they are in. Today's environment is extremely competitive and the margin for error is lower. Nobody wants to be the parent of the most mentally stable Starbucks Barista... Get them into Stanford, then they have the rest of their life to "fail"

>Nobody wants to be the parent of the most mentally stable Starbucks Barista This is a very American problem and the cause my (20's) generation's unhappiness. No one is happy with just being a stable person. Being a stable person is a great goal. Most people aren't.

Yep.

We have lost half a generation to Starbucks jobs, and people know that they are lost. It's ruining their mental health, and not building any kind of economic health. I don't blame the helicopter parents for this, though.

Re: Former Stanford dean explains why helicopter parenting is ruining a generation

#79

You know what. Those parents got those kids into Stanford. Obviously helicopter parenting is working for them. 90% of the decisions people make are based on the environments they are in. Today's environment is extremely competitive and the margin for error is lower. Nobody wants to be the parent of the most mentally stable Starbucks Barista... Get them into Stanford, then they have the rest of their life to "fail"

As a parent, I would a thousand times rather my child be a mentally stable barista than a questionably stable Stanford student. In fact, having recently interacted with the Standard undergraduate body, I feel quite sorry for most of them because it's such a terrible pressure cooker stress environment. My primary goal for my child is for her to be a whole person. If she can do that at Stanford, fine. If she can do tha…

Congratulations - and any tips on staying out the way, gratefully received :-(
Post reply on HN