Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, this struck me as odd: > Who cares what card you have if you’re paying for your expensive meal through your smartphone’s digital wallet? Digital payments didn't kill Amex-as-a-status-symbol, the productization and growing availability of credit cards of all brands did. A status symbol brand doesn't send unsolicited junk mail asking for people to sign up for its product.
It seems to me like the company is caught between a rock and a hard place: the only way to make the card popularly accepted enough that the high-end "status" cardholders can use it anywhere they like is to dilute the brand by convincing as many people as possible to use it.
I wonder why they couldn't just use a sliding fee - take a bigger fee only for larger transactions and secure agreements with retailers not to ask customers to use lower-fee cards when available (as opposed to trying to enforce it by law, which the article talks about), with the promise that accepting Amex will actually bring in these bigger spenders.